Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />NO. ________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Page 1 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION VACATING <br />A PORTION OF THE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT <br />DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 4160083, <br />HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br /> <br />FILE NO. LA21-000043 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and <br />existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on May 19, 2021, Onyx Performance Investment, LLC, <br />(hereinafter the “Applicant”), applied for vacation of a portion of the Sanitary Sewer Easement <br />within 135 Orono Orchard Road North, PID 3411823440035 legally described and depicted in <br />Exhibit A, hereinafter “Easement”: <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on June 21,2021, after published and mailed notice in accordance <br />with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at <br />which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the <br />opportunity to speak thereon; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on June 21, 2021, the Planning Commission voted 6 in favor of <br />and 0 against a motion to recommend approval of the requested vacation; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on July 12, 2021, the City Council reviewed the application <br />and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Orono Council finds the vacation as proposed is in keeping <br />with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The Easement was established in 1975 and has not been used in the <br />intervening years, is not anticipated to be used and as a result the Easement <br />is no longer necessary. <br /> <br />2. There are no drainage or utility improvements within the Easement. <br /> <br />3. The applicant agrees to provide an alternative location for the easement in a <br />location acceptable to the city. <br /> <br />4. The City Council finds that the existing Easement to be vacated has no <br />apparent present or future benefit to the public. <br />