Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, June 21, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 6 of 6 <br /> <br />noted the Applicant is coming in at lower density and thinks everyone needs to understand that this is <br />meant for high density. He noted they cannot just pick it out and put it somewhere else. <br /> <br />Ressler clarified his opinions and believes condensing the height of the roof is a mitigant which makes <br />him comfortable going to 30 feet 9 inches. Reducing the density from what is guided to what is proposed <br />certainly helps and is hopefully helpful for the general public, as well. Another mitigant for exceeding the <br />30 feet height makes it a more desirable building with more desirable tenants and perhaps better <br />neighbors. Ressler stated they have had proposed developments that have gone through sketch plans west <br />of this location in the past and that road will get busier which is something they will all have to adapt to. <br />Traffic counts are worth noting and he thinks those will be monitored as they see development go <br />through. He noted they have a shortage of housing in the community for those who want to live in Orono <br />so this gives some opportunities for families to get into the community they all appreciate. He is for this <br />project, he thinks it is tasteful, and thinks the comments that have been made by the developer seem to be <br />that they want to appease the neighbors, be peaceful, and keep everyone happy. <br /> <br />Libby asked to clarify the primary focus and intent of the Applicant’s need at this point. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated the Applicant has applied for Master Development Plan approval, a zone change to the R- <br />PUD zoning district, and a preliminary plat. <br /> <br />Libby asked if the zoning change is still within the guided spirit of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Barnhart clarified the property is guided for high density residential which is 20-25 units/acre. He noted <br />they do not have a zoning district, other than the R-PUD district, that allows an apartment building at that <br />density. They do have the R-PUD zoning district that allows them to zone the property based on a project <br />they find acceptable for that given area. The Comp Plan guides this for 20-25 units/acre and this project is <br />18 units/acre, so per the Met Council, Barnhart needs to amend the Comp Plan to allow that lower density <br />which is what they have initiated already. <br /> <br />Ressler asked if anyone has an opinion on the patio location. <br /> <br />Gettman does not support the location of the patio as proposed. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted the Commission could approve or deny and then recommend the Applicant address the <br />height issue, the patio, and the fencing/security issue. <br /> <br />Gettman moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA21-000042, 2060 Wayzata Blvd West, Site Plan, <br />Zoning Change, Plat as applied with the 5 Staff Conditions/Recommendations and the 3 additional <br />criteria of the 30 foot maximum height, the adjustment to the fence, and the movement of the patio. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1 (Ressler). <br /> <br />Barnhart noted this item will be reviewed by the City Council on July 12, 2021. <br />