My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-12-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
07-12-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2021 7:21:45 AM
Creation date
11/9/2021 7:06:24 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, June 21, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 1 of 6 <br />2. LA21-000042 MOHEGAN HANSEN ARCH O/B/O CBS MN PROPERTIES, 2060 WAYZATA <br />BLVD WEST, SITE PLAN, ZONING CHANGE, PLAT <br />Todd Mohegan, Applicant, was present. <br />Staff presented a summary packet of information (Item 2 on the Agenda under Public Hearings). Barnhart <br />stated the Applicant is requesting approval for Master Development Plan, Zone Change, and Preliminary <br />Plat approval for a proposed 48 unit market rate apartment building. The building is three stories, plus one <br />level of underground parking. The units themselves are a mix of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom apartments, with <br />balconies. The L shaped building exterior will feature brick, limestone, and cement panels on all four <br />sides. There is private recreational space throughout the building to conform with the PUD zoning <br />district. The project includes a rooftop deck and a patio on the northeast corner of the site. Exercise and <br />community rooms are also proposed. The building height is proposed at 30 feet 9 inches - which is 9 <br />inches taller than the City’s 30 foot standard - so Planning Commission is asked to comment on that. The <br />density of the project is 18.23 units/acre which is lower than the guidance for this property; it was guided <br />in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan at 20-25 units/acre. Staff has been directed by the City Council to <br />initiate an amendment to the Comp Plan to lower the density. He walked the Commission through setback <br />analysis and noted Staff recommends approval subject to the five conditions outlined in the Staff Report: <br />1.) Met Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment that reduces the density below 20- units <br />per acre, 2.) Watershed District approval, 3.) City Engineer approval, 4.) Fire Chief approval, 5.) <br />Approval of the final plat and Development Agreement. <br />Gettman asked about the height of the building and taking off 1 inch per floor rather than 4 inches per <br />floor to get down to the 30 feet. <br />Barnhart stated the City has the authority to approve a building taller than 30 feet that is part of the R- <br />PUD zoning district and it is really the Planning Commission’s feedback on whether the 3 inch drop is <br />enough of a concession to address the Council’s concerns. He noted part of the challenge is the highest <br />adjacent grade is at the northwest corner of the building and there is underground parking at the south <br />corner of the building so there is quite a bit of elevation change within the site. The 30 foot limit is a long- <br />standing practice by the City and he believes it originated in trying to keep buildings below the tree <br />canopy. <br />Erickson asked how the height of this project compares with the senior housing project on Kelley <br />Parkway. <br />Barnhart believes the senior housing project on Kelley Parkway is at 30 feet and the senior housing <br />project east of this project is higher than 30 feet. The City has only approved 2 buildings higher than 30 <br />feet. <br />Peterson noted a letter from one of the neighbors objecting to a change in the zoning. <br />Barnhart learned that just before the meeting and did not receive a copy of that. He is not surprised that <br />some may object to the rezoning as it is proposed to be rezoned to the R-PUD district which would allow <br />higher density development. <br />Ressler said right now it is guided for more density than is applied. He clarified every City in the area has <br />to obey the Met Council’s demands for more density and many cities need to find ways to meet those <br />Council Exhibit D <br />LA21-42
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.