My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-11-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
10-11-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2021 6:04:14 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 5:50:28 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />NO. 7221 <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />2. The Property is located in the LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. <br /> <br />3. The Property contains 0.24 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 50 feet. <br /> <br />4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater <br />Quality Overlay District. <br /> <br />5. Applicant has applied for the following variances: <br />a. Rear Yard Setback Variance <br />b. Side Yard Setback Variance <br /> <br />6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance <br />upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br />conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br />of property in the surrounding area. <br /> <br />ANALYSIS: <br /> <br />1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br />and intent of the ordinance . . . .” The minimal expansions will not adversely impact the <br />adjacent property, nor will it result in a significant massing increase within the side yard <br />setback areas. The requested variances to connect the garage to the home as well as <br />construct a second story over the garage is the minimum amount necessary to meet the <br />owner’s living space needs. This criterion is met. <br /> <br />2. “Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan.” The variances to permit expansions of the residence are <br />consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance to permit a minimal footprint and <br />upward volume expansions is solely to upgrade the livability and functionality of the <br />house. This criterion is met. <br /> <br />3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br />practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in <br />connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br />a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br /> <br />The request to permit the connecting addition to the home and minor upward <br />expansion of the garage within the setbacks is reasonable; additionally, the small <br />connection limits potential massing impacts to neighbors. This criterion is met.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.