Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 20, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />3.LA21-000062 DON GAMBLE O/B/O KIM EDWARDS, TRUSTEE, 2480 CARMAN <br />STREET – ZONE CHANGE CONCEPT REVIEW (STAFF: JEREMY BARNHART) <br />Don Gamble, Applicant, was present. <br />Staff presented a summary packet of information. Barnhart noted the proposal involves policy change. <br />The person representing the properties at 2474 and 2480 Carman Street is requesting feedback on a <br />potential zoning change from a mix of LR-1C-1 and LR-1B to LR-1C. The main difference is in the LR- <br />1B district the minimum lot size is one acre and the minimum width is 140 feet. The Applicant is <br />proposing LR-1C which allows a half-acre minimum lot size and a one-acre minimum width. If these <br />properties are zoned LR-1C, these parcels could be subdivided in creating 4 parcels. The hang-up for the <br />City Council has been creating a non-conforming lot as part of a subdivision and historically the Council <br />does not allow that and held firm with this project. The main change will be a new or additional lot and <br />potentially 2414 Carman could also be subdivided. Barnhart clarified this is not formal approval or a <br />public hearing but Staff is looking for some feedback. <br />Kirchner understands that one lot with two zoning districts does not provide clarity. He also does not <br />believe the resolution is to change these and make them into non-conforming lots as that does not better <br />the situation. <br />Barnhart said by rezoning this, all of the properties will be conforming. <br />Kirchner’s understanding is if they were to be subdivided they would then be non-conforming. <br />Barnhart clarified in changing the zoning district to LR-1C or LR-1C-1, they could subdivide that into 4 <br />pieces and they would be conforming. All properties are zoned residential. <br />Ressler believes that is reasonable. Kirchner agreed. <br />Gettman said in looking at public benefit, he does not see the public benefit to rezone all four parcels; it is <br />already a tight lagoon and he does not see an advantage in putting two more houses there at the water <br />access. <br />The Commissioners discussed access points for the lots. <br />Libby is comfortable with this and noted they would still have lots that are significantly bigger at one-half <br />acre than neighboring lots in the area. <br />Don Gamble, 10704 Water Lily Lane, Woodbury, Applicant, noted he grew up in Orono and his family <br />home on Shoreline Drive just sold. He said this has been a slow-moving project and they are hung up on <br />the front two houses having non-conforming lots and there is no way to take land from the back and give <br />them an acre. He said the only way to get them conforming is to get the zoning conforming with the <br />neighborhood. Casco Point is LR-1C-1 all the way around, and no one knows why there is a difference in <br />zoning. To be contiguous and uniform, the LR-1C also makes those front lots conforming. He explained <br />in taking land from the north lots and adding those to the south lots, they ran into the problem in creating <br />a shoreline that is not 140 feet wide. <br />City Council <br />Exhibit B <br />LA21-62