Laserfiche WebLink
LA21-000059 <br />September 20, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />to be reasonable based on the uniqueness of the neighboring lot, and this <br />neighboring home’s location with respect to the lakeshore. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br />The nonconforming lot area, lot width and location with respect to the <br />neighboring home were not created by the homeowner; and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances <br />are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed to fit the <br />character of the neighborhood. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code <br />Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as a single family home is an allowed use in the <br />LR-1B District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The Property’s substandard size, lack of <br />road frontage, configuration, orientation, and the setback from the lake of the adjacent <br />homes creates difficulties for the Owners in redeveloping the property. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The Property’s substandard size, unique lakeshore, and the setback <br />of the adjacent homes create difficulties for the owners. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. Granting lot area, lot width, and average <br />lakeshore variances are necessary for the preservation of the Property right of the <br />applicant. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the <br />requested variances in this unique situation would not be contrary to the intent of the <br />zoning chapter. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The requested variances are necessary, <br />and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. <br /> <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />To date, no public comments have been received. The applicant submitted a letter of support