Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 10, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 23 of 34 <br /> <br />15. LA21-000024 – LORRAINE GOODWALD, 706 NORTH ARM DRIVE, VARIANCES – <br />Continued <br /> <br />applicant retooled the proposal and reduced the size of the deck; this does increase hardcover over the <br />existing level by about 30 square feet. The applicant wants to get to the same hardcover level and has <br />agreed to remove 30 feet of the impervious surface patio below the deck; Staff supports that change, so <br />the variances requested are for the side, lake, and ALS setbacks and hardcover would be at the 33% which <br />it is currently at right now. Staff recommends approval. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if the design is to be determined or what it looks like now. <br /> <br />Barnhart showed the irregular shape of the deck on screen and said right outside the door it is about 3 feet <br />and it is hard for a wheelchair to get out. The applicant is proposing to make the deck smaller and remove <br />some hardcover below the deck. <br /> <br />Walsh asked about the 0-75. <br /> <br />Barnhart showed the 0-75 lakeyard which kind of cuts through the house, and showed the ALS line that <br />cuts about the last 7-8 feet of the house and the entire deck. All of this side of the house is within the <br />lakeyard and within the ALS. This is a bigger encroachment than what is existing but the hardcover level <br />is the same. The objective from the applicant is to make a more usable deck because there is a challenge <br />opening the door and getting out on to the deck. The applicant’s mother needs a wheelchair and that is <br />part of the goal with this improvement – to make it a little more accessible. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if it is protruding out the same as it was before. <br /> <br />Barnhart believes one portion is about the same, and another portion is not. <br /> <br />Lorraine Goodwald, applicant, said the current deck is 8 feet and then it circles in to about 3 feet 11 <br />inches, so when she opens the door she is at the most narrow portion. She is proposing to stay at the 8 <br />feet, not encroach any more towards the lake, and basically just square it off. She would like to be able to <br />open the door and safely maneuver her mother’s wheelchair without reclining it. She would like it to be <br />functional as right now it is not functional, it is more like a balcony. <br /> <br />Walsh noted this entire thing is just about the deck. <br /> <br />Ms. Goodwald replied it is just about the deck, she is not asking for stairs, roof, nothing else. <br /> <br />Walsh said the entire deck is in the 0-75 and the applicant is basically going to scrape the deck and put a <br />new deck there. To him, as long as it is not closer to the lake, whatever square footage that deck is, they <br />can have the square footage. He clarified whatever the square footage is of the current deck, she can have <br />that square footage for a square or rectangular shaped deck. Otherwise they are adding more square <br />footage in the 0-75. <br />