My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-24-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
05-24-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2021 4:52:38 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 4:49:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 10, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 10 of 34 <br /> <br />14. LA21-000017 – JOSEPH & SARA THULL, 480 BIG ISLAND, PERMIT FOR DOCK ON <br />CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY (BAY PLACE) – UPDATE – Continued <br /> <br />docks by Fred Bunchen’s property, which was approved, as well as a permit to have a dock by Ms. Uran’s <br />property. She noted they filled, took out trees, leveled brush, and left it in a huge pile just down from the <br />cabin. <br /> <br />Walsh asked who is “they”? <br /> <br />Ms. Uran replied she does not know who did it, Gabriel was in charge and was the one pushing for it by <br />the Uran’s property because Fred did not want it by his property. She said it is like the same issue is <br />coming up again and again and is getting pushed down by her property. <br /> <br />Walsh replied they need to remember there are already two licenses for people to dock near her property. <br />He is not pushing anything there, as there are already two people that can put docks there. <br /> <br />Ms. Uran said they had heard ‘massive docks’ and that is what gets people going. She thinks the problem <br />does need to be addressed and she is in favor of one right-of-way, one resident, and one dock. Share the <br />pain, she does not see why they have to have it all down by their property. <br /> <br />Johnson thinks there is support for that. The Council hopes the property owners come up with a solution <br />but if they do not, there is a good sense of a solution from the Council’s vantage point. Ganging them all <br />up on one family is not a realistic way to solve it in Johnson’s mind. <br /> <br />Ms. Uran said it is nice to hear that it will be taken into consideration. People are also concerned about <br />having a dock next to them: will someone come roaring in on an ATV and disturb things? Ms. Uran <br />stated having the dock next to them did not decrease their property values. Yes, it is inconvenient and <br />nobody wants the dock by them. She clarified during a wet season, the dock near her is almost <br />underwater. Ms. Uran would love to see this get solved, as well, and she is not sure there will be a <br />solution everyone will agree on. <br /> <br />Suzy Thiss said she and her husband Peter live at 270 Big Island, right next to Bay Place. She read the <br />minutes from the last meeting and attended a planning session; she would like to understand what the <br />permit says as it transfers from one person to the next person. <br /> <br />As Walsh understands, whoever applies for it and gets approved, the other person gets knocked off. <br /> <br />Ms. Thiss asked what the Council thinks about that. <br /> <br />Walsh said it was set up oddly and they are trying to solve that problem, as well. <br /> <br />Ms. Thiss thinks the application should be denied and something more realistic put in place. She took a <br />look at the map and said there is a place on Cruiser’s Cove that is adjacent to park land; that particular <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.