My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
05-10-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2021 4:48:47 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 4:38:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LA21-000024 <br />April 19, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code <br />Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as residential improvements are an allowed <br />use in theLR-1B District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The lot shape, and depth, and the home’s <br />proximity to the lake are particular to this property. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The setbacks of adjacent homes in this neighborhood are somewhat <br />similar to this lot. The conditions specifically impacting this property (lot area, lot width <br />and shape, and home proximity to the lake) do not generally apply to the other <br />properties in the LR-1B district. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. The owners indicate that granting the <br />variances are necessary for the preservation of their property right. However, their <br />property right is established by home and existing improvements on this substandard <br />lot. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the <br />variances to allow construction of a deck is not likely to impair health, safety, and <br />comfort. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The application for the deck expansion <br />is limited by existing conditions of the property and orientation to the lake. T he <br />granting of the requesting variances are necessary to alleviate the practical difficulty <br />resulting for the location of the existing home and limited building envelope on the <br />property. <br /> <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />The applicant submitted letters from the abutting neighbors in support of the project. <br /> <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance (s), if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood? <br />3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.