Laserfiche WebLink
Summary <br /> <br />Vacant lots have inferior privileges; referenced as vacant lot in legal documents, IRS <br />forms, lending, purchase agreements etc. <br /> <br />I submit the relevant discussion that lines up with Big Island comp plans, the two dock <br />permits, easements; historical use, City ordinances, LMCD regulations, and intent of all <br />exclude a vacant lot. <br /> <br />Is the City responsible to secure docks for remaining five vacant lots with no precedent? <br /> <br />Did applicant deliver data, intent or material facts to support vacant lots qualify for a <br />dock/permit? <br /> <br />Did applicant deliver any valid data to support vacant lots qualify for a dock/permit, to <br />encroach, impose intent and conditions to police #2038 in good standing to 230? <br /> <br />Although precedent is set on #2038; #4465 also states inland properties. 220 was split off <br />but had a structure. Perhaps more flexible but also restricted for use to an inland property. <br /> <br />With no precedent set on Big Island for vacant lots with no lakeshore I submit it does not <br />qualify. The two existing permits retire from requests to revoke/share. It was proven all <br />inland properties have use of a dock. City approved easements that resolve future issues. <br /> <br />I respectfully ask Council to deny Mr. and Mrs. Thull’s application for a dock noting on <br />record for future reference the problems, hardships, and precedent set in writing on #2038 <br />as a historical unique situation to 230 BI. <br />. <br />Thank you for your consideration, patience and understanding with efforts invested. <br /> <br />Nancy L Farnes <br />230 Big Island <br />612-272-6611 <br /> <br />CC: City planners, Council and Mayor <br /> Notified property owners at BI <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Page 2