Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 12, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 10 of 15 <br /> <br />17. LA21-000017 – Joseph & Sara Thull, 480 Big Island, Permit for Dock City on ROW (Bay Place) <br />– Continued <br /> <br />Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to table LA21-000017 – Joseph & Sara Thull, 480 Big Island, <br />Permit for Dock City on ROW (Bay Place) until the next City Council meeting. VOTE: Ayes 5, <br />Nays 0. <br /> <br />18. LA20-000053 – Dale Richardson o/b/o CBS MN Properties, LLC, 2060 Wayzata Blvd W, Sketch <br />Plan <br /> <br />Dale Richardson, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Barnhart presented a summary packet of information. Dale Richardson is requesting initial sketch plan <br />feedback on the proposed zone change to an R-PUD zoning district. He proposes to build a new 48 unit <br />market-rate apartment building just west of Orono Woods on Wayzata Boulevard. The proposed building <br />would be three stories of apartments and one level of parking, most of which is underground. During the <br />review of the concept plan, Staff and the Planning Commission identified several areas for future <br />discussion or waivers. He noted in the R-PUD zoning district waivers can be approved, the idea being <br />flexibility in the requirements and in exchange they receive something they are looking for as a City that <br />maybe does not quite fit the code. Things identified by Staff and Planning Commission included the site <br />size, the R-PUD zoning district requires a five acre minimum, although there are a number of <br />considerations/exemptions the Council can approve. One is if the project is a transitional project, to the <br />west is a gas station and warehouse, to the east is an apartment building, and to the north is single family <br />residential. The Council could consider this a transition between high-active gas station and low density <br />residential. The project is either 35 feet or 41 feet in height based on the defined height and there is some <br />debate how the site height is calculated. The 35 feet is based on pre-development levels of grading. This <br />property was approved as an office/townhome project around 2005-2007. The property was graded to <br />accommodate those walkout office buildings; only one of those buildings was built although another <br />foundation was poured but activity did not continue. Using the pre-development grading (before 2007- <br />2008) the calculation would be 35 feet. Right now it is 41 feet so it is higher than what the Council has <br />historically allowed from a building-height standpoint, which has been 30 feet. Other Planning <br />Commission conversations included the roof style, this rendering shows a flat roof building and the R- <br />PUD zoning district requires an architectural pitched roof. There has been some change in what is <br />residential between now and when the R-PUD zoning district was drafted as they are now seeing more <br />flat roofs. The Planning Commission did not seem too opposed to the height increase if it was a flat roof <br />structure. If there are modifications to the height allowed, they will have to provide some kind of a <br />waiver from a setback standpoint. The building meets the minimum setback requirements based on the <br />zoning district from the north and the east, however, there is also a stipulation that in no case shall the <br />setback be less than the height of the building. If the building is determined to be 41 feet they will need <br />to see a 41 foot setback, primarily from the east. Finally, the R-PUD zoning district requires a 10% of <br />gross land area for private recreation, usually a combination of trails, play area, open space. This project <br />shows a dog run area, an outdoor patio/grill area, and trails to link those amenities. It also shows 2 rooftop <br />deck facilities which would be unique for Orono. Barnhart pointed out this is not looking like a <br />subdivision so there will not be any park dedication collected as part of the project. The Planning 18.