Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMARY OF 12/4/00 GENERAL COMMENTS BY PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> RPUD ORDINANCE <br /> (See also draft ordinance attached with pencilled notes) <br /> ❑ Add language - "the only place where more than 2-1/2 stories/more than 30' defined <br /> height will be allowed is where commercial property is rezoned to residential..." <br /> ❑ Need financial numbers from Dunbar to justify 70 units vs lesser number (see Rusty) <br /> ❑ Based on parking need, site works better for lesser number of units at 2/1 ratio <br /> ❑ Any way to make this into two buildings of 25-0 units each? <br /> ❑ Massing is an issue due to height and length of building <br /> ❑ Also concerned about firefighting issues <br /> ❑ Add a preamble to better describe what our goals and intents are <br /> ❑ Limit 2 and 5-acre zones to single family, no multiple <br /> ❑ Limit the locations where apartments can be developed <br /> ❑ RPUD should not be allowed in Shoreland for now (but maybe consider it later...) <br /> ❑ Consider relating height to setback, or to sun angle related to adjoining lot lines, such <br /> as maybe consider limiting multiple family to 2 stories, but allow 3 stories if no winter <br /> sun blockage at adjoining lot lines; or if 3 stories, setback must be 1.5 times the peak <br /> height <br />