Laserfiche WebLink
Building setbacks: <br /> The setback for all buildings from exterior RPUD lot lines would be 35' except that in no <br /> case shall the setback be less than the height of the building. One concern is the building location <br /> being proposed at 41'to the rear lot line. The developer will provide a new site plan at the Planning <br /> Commission meeting that would indicate a greater setback to the rear property line. The property <br /> is very limited by the MnDot pond for developing the housing further from the property line. One <br /> non-desirable option to allow the building to be located even further from the rear lot line would be <br /> to located the access to north of the building. This may not be the best option as a building would <br /> be a better"neighbor"to the residential properties to the north than a service road providing access <br /> to the buildings and a clinic. <br /> Building Height: <br /> The intent of the RPUD district is to provide housing to meet lifecycle, and affordable and <br /> moderate cost housing needs. As discussed with the review of the RPUD ordinance, the housing <br /> types may require buildings to exceed the 30'standard that applies to single family residential homes <br /> and office buildings. The only district that could allow a building greater than 30' is the Industrial <br /> district which all 3 stories or 40'. <br /> The proposed building would have a peak height of close to 50'as viewed from the back side <br /> of the structure. Staffs determination of the defined height of the building averages 38'. Strict <br /> interpretation of the ordinance would define the height at 45', lowest grade adjoining building to <br /> highest midpoint of the roof Because the RPUD ordinance has not been adopted,no standard exists <br /> for building height in the district. The developer has stated to allow the project to work the building <br /> would have to be three stories or moderately priced senior rental units would not be feasible. <br /> No. of Parking Stalls: Required= 2 per dwelling unit (Section 10.61) <br /> Required = 140 spaces <br /> Total stalls proposed = 83 interior spaces <br /> 70 exterior spaces <br /> Section 10.30 establishes required parking for the M-6, Multiple Family Zoning District as <br /> 2 spaces per unit plus .25 spaces for each unit as additional parking areas for guests. A minimum <br /> of one space per unit shall be provided on the interior of the building. While this proposal is not <br /> subject to the M-6 standards,these standards provide a guideline for parking for a standard apartment <br /> building. <br /> The standards for a building designed for senior housing use may not require the same <br /> parking standards. The applicants have stated they do not feel all the parking proposed on site will <br /> be necessary for the use. They will be providing additional information as to parking needs for other <br /> similar projects to justify the amount of spaces provided. <br /> IV. Road/Parking/Access <br /> The property would have two access points. One on Brown Road North to serve the entire <br /> development and provide access to a future signal light at the intersection of Highway 12 and Brown <br /> Road. A second access point for the properties would be to Highway 12 for right in/right out turns. <br /> The City of Orono's traffic consultant has reviewed the plan and has determined the development <br /> Orono Amber,LLC. <br /> 2060 Wayzata Boulevard <br /> #2640#2641 <br /> Page 6 <br />