Laserfiche WebLink
Dunbar Fees Analysis <br /> February 7, 2001 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Highway 12 Current S/W Connection Charge <br /> Prior to March 2000 the 1989 Highway 12 Sewer and Water Connection Charge unit rate totaled <br /> $9,695 per unit.In March 2000 Council adopted Ordinance 195,Second series which converted this <br /> to an acreage charge in order to assure repayment of remaining project bonds regardless of the <br /> ultimate number of units developed,and to keep the connection charge somewhat reasonable for the <br /> types of development anticipated and wanted in the Highway 12 area. The acreage charge under the <br /> 2001 fee schedule is$5,105/acre for sewer and$8,440/acre for water,for a total of$13,545 per acre. <br /> This applies to both residential and non-residential properties. <br /> Connection Charge Options for Dunbar Project <br /> The question remaining,then,is what to charge for the additional 34 units required for Outlot F.Two <br /> options appear to exist: <br /> Option 1. A case can be made that the site has 41 of 75 units paid, or 55% of the required <br /> units, and should pay 45% of the current connection charge for the remaining 34 units. The <br /> total site is 6.7 acres. The connection charge would be calculated as follows: <br /> 6.7 acres x $13,545/acre x 0.45 = $40,838 (this figure would change slightly <br /> depending on the final number of required units) <br /> Option 2. It could be argued that Rebers initially paid this property's fair share of the costs <br /> of sewer/water installation, having been assessed approximately $277,100 for the 44 units for <br /> Phases I and II, and should incur no additional costs regardless of the number of units <br /> ultimately developed. <br /> Note that SAC charges for the project will be at the current Met Council rate of$1150 per unit or <br /> totaling approximately $86,000. <br /> Note also that the excess units needed for Outlot F are directly a result of the senior housing project, <br /> and would likely not be needed if all of Outlot F were to develop commercially as currently zoned. <br /> Therefore, the cost of the excess units should be attributed to the senior housing, not the office <br /> building. <br />