My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council & HRA Minutes
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Wayzata Boulevard West
>
2040 Wayzata Boulevard West - 34-118-23-21-0036 - (Orono HRA)
>
Land Use
>
2040 Wayzata Blvd Land Use - Dunbar
>
Council Resolutions RE: TIF - File Cabinet 1
>
Council & HRA Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:55:41 PM
Creation date
10/7/2021 1:27:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2040
Street Name
Wayzata
Street Type
Boulevard
Street Direction
West
Address
2040 Wayzata Boulevard West
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
3411823210036
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> February 26,2001 <br /> (#2550 Charles Van Eeckhout,Continued) <br /> Sansevere inquired whether the Applicant prefers the Council vote on the resolution. <br /> Van Eeckhout stated in his view the time extension is not the big issue tonight. Van Eeckhout <br /> stated until he signed the extension on December 151,the City did not have extension for a period <br /> of time. <br /> Flint stated at the time the Applicant signed the last extension he agreed to do so without any <br /> prejudice to any rights which have accrued to the Applicant in the past. <br /> Mayor Peterson inquired whether the Applicant will agree to an extension. <br /> Van Eeckhout stated he is convinced an extension will not do anything for him. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> (#6) #2631 CITY OF ORONO—ZONING CODE AMENDMENT—RPUD RESIDENTIAL <br /> PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT—ORDINANCE NO.202,2ND SERIES <br /> Gaffron stated the City Council discussed this matter in a work session last week,with the <br /> Council requesting some minor changes to the Ordinance. Gaffron stated the requested <br /> modifications have been incorporated into the ordinance and are defined in his February 23,2001 <br /> memorandum. Gaffron recommended the Council adopt the ordinance for creation of a <br /> residential planned unit development district. <br /> Flint questioned the section regarding clustered use in a rural area and whether that is good policy <br /> on the part of the City. Flint inquired if someone had ten acres in a five acre zoning whether they <br /> would be permitted to have two units in close proximity to one another. <br /> Moorse stated it is his understanding of the ordinance that clustering of single family homes is <br /> permitted in the rural areas but clustering in addition to that is only permitted in the urban areas. <br /> Gaffron stated if a person has ten acres and wants to construct two dwellings in close proximity, <br /> that would be acceptable. Gaffron stated they would be permitted to construct two houses on the <br /> ten acres but not three. Gaffron stated it is reasonable to expect that someone might cluster eight <br /> homes on two acre sites with 32 acres remaining open in order to make the septic work. <br /> Flint stated that cluster is not attached. <br /> Gaffron stated with attached dwellings you start to deal with issues relating to sewer and <br /> maintaining open space. <br /> Flint stated the Council can probably review this issue in the future. <br /> Gaffron commented the City has generally thought of rural areas as having single family units <br /> and not attached housing units. <br /> PAGE 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.