Laserfiche WebLink
Dunbar Fees Analysis <br /> February 7, 2001 <br /> Page 2 <br /> I. SEWER & WATER CONNECTION CHARGES ANALYSIS <br /> The Dunbar project involves developing within Outlot F, Sugar Woods, a 62-unit senior housing <br /> building and a 27,000 s.f.office building. The senior housing building is expected to equal 62 SAC <br /> units. The office building is expected to net out at approximately 10 SAC units,although this could <br /> increase to perhaps 12-14 units depending on the extent of medical office fixtures installed. <br /> For discussion purposes,the two buildings will be considered as requiring a total of 75 SAC units. <br /> One SAC unit is the equivalent of 1 City sewer unit or 274 gpd. <br /> Outlot F 1989 Assessed Unit Allocation <br /> The document controlling the use and assessment of sewer and water units for Outlot F is the 1989 <br /> Petition for Local Improvements submitted by Otten, Wear and Rebers. In 1989 Otten, Wear and <br /> Rebers were each assessed for the costs of the SugarWoods/North Highway 12 sewer and water <br /> trunk(Phase I)and each were assessed for the Phase II improvements which included a)well,pump <br /> station, and connections for the assessed parcels; b) sewer upgrade to connect Phase I trunk to <br /> MWCC interceptor;and c)water tower construction and connections.Each were allocated a specific <br /> number of sewer and water units. The project was assessed on the basis of a total of 329 units,with <br /> 40 units allocated to Otten, 10 units to Wear and 69 units to Rebers. The remaining 210 units were <br /> expected to be used and paid for by future development in the Highway 12 area. <br /> Of Rebers' 69 units, 25 were attributed to the Sugar Woods residential development. Rebers paid <br /> off the assessment for the 25 Sugar Woods residential units in 1989; the remaining 44 units were <br /> specially assessed at a rate totaling approximately $6,300 per unit, and final payments for Phase II <br /> will occur in 2002. Of these 44, 3 were sold to Service 800 in 1999 for use in Sugar Woods Outlot <br /> E, and the remaining 41 are available for development within Outlot F. <br /> Because Rebers' remaining allocation of 41 units is less than the 75 units that will be required to <br /> serve Outlot F, a total of 34 units are technically lacking. While the 1989 Petition clearly specifies <br /> that the petitioners will be reimbursed for unused units at the full assessment rate plus interest upon <br /> full development, it says nothing about purchase of additional units should the development exceed <br /> the number of allocated units. It might be assumed that the extra required units should be purchased <br /> by the developer at the current connection charge rate for the 1989 Highway 12 sewer/water project. <br /> One might argue, however, that Rebers simply paid for a share of the sewer and water system at a <br /> rate that was determined by a unit allocation but which didn't limit him to that allocation. <br />