Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> No. of Parking Stalls: Required= 2 per dwelling unit(Section 10.61) <br /> Required= 140 spaces <br /> Total stalls proposed = 83 interior spaces <br /> 50 exterior spaces <br /> The standards for a building designed for senior housing use may not require the same <br /> parking standards. The applicants have stated they do not feel all the parking proposed on site will <br /> be necessary for the use. They will be providing additional information as to parking needs for other <br /> similar projects to justify the amount of spaces provided. <br /> IV. Grading and Drainage <br /> The proposed grading plan shows the parking lot in the northwest corner of the site approximately <br /> 10' higher than the adjoining property to the south. The City Engineer is recommending this part <br /> of the site be lowered at least 4'. The retaining wall could then be eliminated. <br /> Additional engineering is required for further review of the proposal. The developer should provide <br /> storm sewer and ponding calculations for review. <br /> V. Landscaping Plans/Pedestrian Ways <br /> The revised set of plans show a 6'trail that connects the existing trail on the east side of the property <br /> to the west side of the property. This is a change from the last set as no trail was provided. <br /> The RPUD ordinance has proposed a landscaping value to be required based on a percentage of the <br /> project value. For a development greater than$4,000,000 the minimum landscaping value that must <br /> be provided would equal 1% of the project value. Wally Case, the City's landscaping consultant, <br /> would complete an estimate of the landscaping value based on the proposed ordinance when final <br /> plans have been submitted. <br /> Some of the existing trees would be removed to make room for the project. The plans submitted <br /> have been designed to protect several mature trees that are located between the proposed building <br /> and Highway 12. Protection of those trees requires the building and access road to be shifted to the <br /> north. An adjacent property owner to the north has expressed concerns about the location of the <br /> building being 60' from the rear property line. <br /> Options for Action <br /> Planning Commission is advised that, per the Highway 12 PUD provisions of 10.53, this proposal <br /> is at the General Concept Stage, equivalent to the preliminary plat stage of a subdivision. The <br /> General Concept Plan can be approved by the Orono Council and bind the approval to a resolution. <br /> Council approval of the concept plan requires a 4/5 vote. <br /> Staff Recommends the Planning Commission Recommend approval of the General Concept Plans <br /> and forward the plans to the Council for adoption of a resolution approving the General Concept <br /> Plans. <br /> Orono Ambar,LLC. <br /> 2060 Wayzata Boulevard <br /> #2640/#2641 <br /> Page 7 of 7 <br />