Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMARY OF DECEMBER 7,2000 WORK SESSION DISCUSSION <br /> REGARDING SENIOR HOUSING PROPOSAL <br /> There was general agreement among the Council Members and the residents in attendance <br /> at the work session that the concept of a senior housing development on the site is acceptable. <br /> However,there were concerns regarding the height and massing of the proposed building. There was <br /> substantial discussion regarding options for addressing this concern. The option determined to be <br /> both feasible and effective in reducing the impact of the building's height on the neighbors to the <br /> north was to eliminate the top story of the easternmost portion of the building, which is closest to <br /> the neighbors. This would result in a reduction in the number of units from 70 to 62. <br /> There was also concern regarding the City's ability to ensure the building would continue to <br /> be used for senior housing, both in the medium term (20-30 years) and in the long term. It was <br /> discussed that the City's financial participation (i.e., through TIF) gives the City control for the <br /> duration of this participation (20-25 years). There were two options discussed for maintaining <br /> control of the use of the building in the long term. One was the imposition of restrictive covenants <br /> that would require the building to continue to be used for senior housing. It is questionable whether <br /> the owner of the building would agree to such covenants, and whether those covenants could be <br /> extended far into the future. <br /> Another option considered was the City's purchase of the land. This would enable the City <br /> to control the use through a long term lease arrangement restricting the use of the land to senior <br /> housing. These options need to be further explored. <br /> Mr. Dunbar indicated financial assistance, i.e., TIF, was essential to the feasibility of the <br /> project. Council Member Kelley indicated it was his opinion the City should not be involved <br /> financially. Jabbour indicated there is agreement regarding the need for the project. The City's <br /> financial participation provides two benefits. First,it makes the project feasible. Second,it provides <br /> the City with control over the project, at least in the medium term. It was determined that the use <br /> of Tax Increment Financing should continue to be pursued. <br />