Laserfiche WebLink
November 7, 2000 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> The second access drive connects directly to TH 12, south of the proposed site. At the location of this <br /> access, TH 12 currently has a closed median. We would recommend a right in/right out only access at this <br /> location, leaving the median,.on TH 12 closed. We further recommend a short right turn lane be created <br /> from TH 12 into the access drive. By re-striping the existing markings with a short taper immediately <br /> following Brown Road North, this lane could be created without widening TH 12. One lane in each <br /> direction would suffice for the amount of traffic expected for this access drive. <br /> A third access is in the northwest corner of the site. Based on site plan drawings and field reconnaissance, <br /> we were unable to determine where this access leads. Further investigation will be needed before making a <br /> recommendation. However, we would not recommend this access if the drive connects into a residential <br /> area. Due to the high volumes on TH 12 and the likely delays for vehicles turning onto TH 12 from the side <br /> streets, it is likely that many motorists would seek this route as an alternative to the other access drives. <br /> Thus, the amount of'cut-thru' traffic in the connected area would likely increase dramatically. <br /> Internal Traffic Flow <br /> From the access directly off TH 12, motorists proceed to an internal intersection and are able to choose to go <br /> to the office building or the senior housing,. This allows vehicle trips to and from each building without <br /> disruption of activity at the other. The access drive connecting to Brown Road North does not provide this <br /> type of separation. Motorists using this access to and from the office building would be driving through the <br /> middle of the senior housing parking, creating safety concerns. Correcting this potential problem would <br /> require changes to the existing site plan. Some options include: <br /> • Swapping the location of each building so the office building is on the east side of the lot and the <br /> senior housing is on the west side of the lot. Although this may result in the undesirable situation of <br /> apartment residents driving through the office parking lot, office users are generally used to more <br /> vehicle activity in their building's parking lot. <br /> • Provide a separate drive aisle to the south of the senior housing parking. This puts the parking close <br /> to the building while allowing other vehicles to continue through the lot without disruption from <br /> parking activities. <br /> • Provide a separate drive aisle north of the senior housing building. Apartment parking could remain <br /> as shown or be shifted to the north side of the building as well. Either option would allow office <br /> users to use this drive instead of going through the apartment parking area. <br /> Changes should be made to separate the office users from driving through the senior housing areas. <br /> The access drive in the northwest corner of the site could have motorists from the senior housing driving <br /> through the middle of the office parking, depending on where this access leads. Although not desirable, <br /> office users are generally used to more vehicle activity in their building's parking lot. As stated before, this <br /> access drive and its relation to the internal traffic flow should be re-assessed when more information is <br /> known. <br /> Pedestrian Movements <br /> To provide additional safety and encourage pedestrian movements, sidewalks should connect each building <br /> to the existing trail and sidewalk system, located on the east and south sides of the lot. This would allow <br /> people from either building another option to use to reach nearby land uses or for general exercise. <br /> Bonestroo, Rosene,Anderlik and Associates <br /> 2335 West Highway 36 + St. Paul, MN 55113 + Phone: 651-636-4600 + Fax: 651-636-1311 <br />