My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Parking Setbacks
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Wayzata Boulevard West
>
2040 Wayzata Boulevard West - 34-118-23-21-0036 - (Orono HRA)
>
Land Use
>
2040 Wayzata Blvd Land Use - Dunbar
>
Staff Memos & Correspondence - File Cabinet 1
>
Parking Setbacks
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:55:45 PM
Creation date
10/4/2021 1:25:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2040
Street Name
Wayzata
Street Type
Boulevard
Street Direction
West
Address
2040 Wayzata Boulevard West
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
3411823210036
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> RPUD Ordinance <br /> November 14, 2000 <br /> Page 4 <br /> The point is, this building and others like it providing 3-level housing options, will not be feasible <br /> without straying from our historic height limits. Why do we have height limits? 1) To limit the <br /> visual impact of structures as viewed from off site; 2)To maintain light,air and open space enjoyed <br /> by the extant site and adjoining properties; 3) To stay within the limitations of local firefighting <br /> capabilities; and 4)any number of perhaps more subtle reasons. If an applicant can demonstrate to <br /> the Council's satisfaction that each of these height limitation factors can be suitably met or <br /> mitigated, then a basis would exist for allowing the requested height. <br /> There are three options: <br /> 1. Establish a height limit that will accommodate the type of development the City intends to <br /> occur in this district; OR <br /> 2. Have no established height limit, but establish guidelines to be used in determining an <br /> acceptable building height; OR <br /> 3. Leave building height entirely to the subjective discretion of the Planning Commission and <br /> Council, with no established guidelines. <br /> RPUD Procedural Requirements <br /> Application review, approval and amendment procedures are generally described in Subd. 6 thru <br /> Subd. 9. These have not been revised since the version you reviewed in October. Substantial detail <br /> in terms of specific plan submittal requirements could be added, using our Highway 12 PUD <br /> (Section 10.53) as a reference. Ultimately, however, the City should consider extracting the PUD <br /> procedural requirements out of this RPUD District ordinance and make all PUD's subject to a <br /> separate generic "PUD Procedures" code section similar to that of 10.53. <br /> For now,the senior housing application immediately confronting the City is subject to the standards <br /> of 10.53 as it is part of the Highway 12 corridor; 10.53 is the `umbrella' PUD section for review of <br /> the Dunbar senior housing/office proposal. But not all properties that might use the RPUD in the <br /> future are within the Highway 12 corridor, so 10.53 cannot act as that generic PUD Procedures <br /> the future. <br /> without some changes in <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Subject to any further changes the Planning Commission feels are needed, staff recommends <br /> approval of the proposed ordinance to establish standards and authority for the RPUD District as a <br /> residential zoning option. A final factor to keep in mind: Rezoning from any other zone to RPUD <br /> is a completely legislative action on the Council's part;the Council can say no to it if they so choose, <br /> and approval takes a 4/5ths vote. And with the PUD status,Council can set whatever conditions are <br /> necessary to make a development proposal acceptable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.