Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> RPUD Ordinance <br /> November 14, 2000 <br /> Page 4 <br /> The point is, this building and others like it providing 3-level housing options, will not be feasible <br /> without straying from our historic height limits. Why do we have height limits? 1) To limit the <br /> visual impact of structures as viewed from off site; 2)To maintain light,air and open space enjoyed <br /> by the extant site and adjoining properties; 3) To stay within the limitations of local firefighting <br /> capabilities; and 4)any number of perhaps more subtle reasons. If an applicant can demonstrate to <br /> the Council's satisfaction that each of these height limitation factors can be suitably met or <br /> mitigated, then a basis would exist for allowing the requested height. <br /> There are three options: <br /> 1. Establish a height limit that will accommodate the type of development the City intends to <br /> occur in this district; OR <br /> 2. Have no established height limit, but establish guidelines to be used in determining an <br /> acceptable building height; OR <br /> 3. Leave building height entirely to the subjective discretion of the Planning Commission and <br /> Council, with no established guidelines. <br /> RPUD Procedural Requirements <br /> Application review, approval and amendment procedures are generally described in Subd. 6 thru <br /> Subd. 9. These have not been revised since the version you reviewed in October. Substantial detail <br /> in terms of specific plan submittal requirements could be added, using our Highway 12 PUD <br /> (Section 10.53) as a reference. Ultimately, however, the City should consider extracting the PUD <br /> procedural requirements out of this RPUD District ordinance and make all PUD's subject to a <br /> separate generic "PUD Procedures" code section similar to that of 10.53. <br /> For now,the senior housing application immediately confronting the City is subject to the standards <br /> of 10.53 as it is part of the Highway 12 corridor; 10.53 is the `umbrella' PUD section for review of <br /> the Dunbar senior housing/office proposal. But not all properties that might use the RPUD in the <br /> future are within the Highway 12 corridor, so 10.53 cannot act as that generic PUD Procedures <br /> the future. <br /> without some changes in <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Subject to any further changes the Planning Commission feels are needed, staff recommends <br /> approval of the proposed ordinance to establish standards and authority for the RPUD District as a <br /> residential zoning option. A final factor to keep in mind: Rezoning from any other zone to RPUD <br /> is a completely legislative action on the Council's part;the Council can say no to it if they so choose, <br /> and approval takes a 4/5ths vote. And with the PUD status,Council can set whatever conditions are <br /> necessary to make a development proposal acceptable. <br />