Laserfiche WebLink
FROM FAEGRE•&'ORNSON (THU) 11. 8' 01 14:53/ST. 14:45/NO. 4862015316 P 4 <br /> F?OM*BFST & FLANAGAN ;Tru'; 11 8' 01 8 44/ST. 8 4;, :VC. 4863199/83 ? 4 <br /> J <br /> - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> • In 1990, the Study Area had a total of 14,519 persons and 8,755 households ages 55 and <br /> over. The Study Area experienced substantial growth in the older adult base between 1990 <br /> and 2000. During this period, the Study Area saw its older adult base grow by 8,217 persons <br /> and 4,397 households, growth rates of 57% and 50%,respectively. <br /> • Growth in the Study Area's older adult base is forecast to remain fairly constant in the <br /> coming years. Between 2000 and 2005, the Study Area is forecast to add 5,861 older adults <br /> (+21%) and 3,063 older adult households(+23%)_ Much of the growth will occur in the age <br /> 55-64 cohort, due to the baby boomer generation aging into their mid-SOs. While most of the <br /> demand for independent senior housing comes from households between the ages of 65 and <br /> 80, in recent years,we have seen increasing numbers of households between the ages of 55 to <br /> 64 also consider alternative housing. <br /> Older Adult Income Distribution and Household Tenure <br /> 4E24 • <br /> • As of 2000,households age 55 to 64 had a median income of$91,608 versus $46,742 for <br /> households age 65 to 79 and 334,241 for households age 80 and older. <br /> • In 1990, roughly 80 percent of Study Area older adult households(6.62.5 households)owned <br /> their homes. <br /> • As seniors age, they may no longer desire, or be able, to maintain their single-family homes. <br /> They may prefer to move to housing that offers them greater freedom from maintenance <br /> and/or offers them support services. Seniors typically begin to consider moving into rental <br /> housing in their early 70s. As of 1990,roughly 88%of households age 55 to 64 owned their <br /> housing compared to 82%of households age 65 to 74 and only 60%of older seniors (age 75 <br /> and over). <br /> Competitive Marker Analysis over-a /I - Se <br /> • The ental market in the Cie Study Area has a current vacancy rate of 3.7%. This is a <br /> higher vacancy rate than recent times, due in part to less job transfers to the area, a small but <br /> moderate number of layoffs, and the desirability for renters to choose locations closer to <br /> Downtown Minneapolis, such as Uptown. <br /> • Presently, there are four non-subsidized independent senior housing developments with a <br /> total of 472 units in the Study Area. Two of the projects,containing 133 units, are located in <br /> the City of Plymouth. The remaining two,with 339 units, are located in Minnetonka. <br /> • A survey of the • i• • titive develo i ments conducted by our firm revealed only 4 vacant <br /> units as •' une 001, a vacancy rate of only 0.8°2)Nearly all buildings surveyed also re- <br /> ported they had : bstanhal waiting listsTCurrently, additional 20 units would used to be- <br /> come vacant ju t to reach the 5%market equilibrium vacancy rate, <br /> /ddYq 1S . <br /> _ w <br /> MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 3 <br />