Laserfiche WebLink
by independent investigation. We have relied on representations of the Borrower and <br /> Wedum as to the application of the proceeds of the Bonds and the nature, use, cost and <br /> economic life of the Project Facilities (as defined in the Loan Agreement) financed by the <br /> Bonds. We also have relied upon the opinion of Christoffel & Elliott, P.A. of even date <br /> herewith to the effect that, subject to the matters set forth in the opinion: (i) the Loan <br /> Agreement, the Mortgage, the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, the Bond Purchase <br /> Agreement,the Disbursing Agreement,the Development Agreement and the Ground Lease <br /> (collectively, the "Borrower Documents") have each been duly authorized, executed and <br /> delivered by the Borrower and each constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the <br /> Borrower, (ii)the Borrower is a limited liability company whose sole member, Wedum, is <br /> a nonprofit corporation and an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal <br /> Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") whose income is exempt from federal <br /> taxation under Section 501(a) of the Code, (iii) the Borrower will be disregarded as a <br /> separate entity for federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 7701 of the Code and, <br /> accordingly,Wedum will be treated as the owner of the Project Facilities for federal income <br /> tax purposes, and (iv) performance by the Borrower of its obligations under the Borrower <br /> Documents will not violate or conflict with existing laws. We have also relied on title <br /> insurance commitments as to the title to the Project Facilities,without examining the records <br /> of the Borrower or original title records or abstracts of title. <br /> By this opinion we assume no responsibility and render no opinion as to the <br /> correctness or completeness of any information contained in the Official Statement used in <br /> connection with the offer or sale of the Bonds. <br /> Based on our examination, we are of the opinion, as of the date hereof, as follows: <br /> 1. The Issuer is a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State <br /> of Minnesota, and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act"), <br /> the Issuer is authorized to issue the Bonds,to loan the proceeds thereof to the Borrower, to <br /> execute and deliver the Loan Agreement,the Indenture and the Development Agreement and <br /> to assign the Mortgage to the Trustee. <br /> 2. The Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Development Agreement and the <br /> Assignment of Mortgage are each a valid and binding instrument of the Issuer, enforceable <br /> in accordance with their respective terms. <br /> 3. The Bonds have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Issuer <br /> and are valid and binding special, limited obligations of the Issuer. The Bonds are secured <br /> by an assignment of loan repayments payable by the Borrower under the Loan Agreement <br /> that are scheduled to be sufficient(if timely paid in full)to pay the principal of and interest <br /> on the Bonds when due,and by the pledge of the funds and investments held by the Trustee <br /> under the Indenture for payment or security for such Bonds.Payment of the loan repayments <br /> is secured by the Mortgage. <br />