My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 7199
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
O
>
Orono Lane
>
1395 Orono Lane - 02-117-23-34-0006
>
Resolutions
>
Res 7199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:09:54 PM
Creation date
9/27/2021 3:57:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1395
Street Name
Orono
Street Type
Lane
Address
1395 Orono La
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0211723340006
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RfiSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 7 19 9 <br />Plan. The variance to permit the minimal upward volume expansions is solely to upgrade <br />the functionality of the carriage house, as well as allow the boathouse to conform to the <br />floodplain regulations. The setbacks of the boathouse do not allow for the full 15 feet of <br />rescue bench fill around the building as required. This criterion is met. <br />3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br />practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. 'Practical difficulties,' as used in <br />connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br />a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br />The request to permit minor upward expansions of the buildings within the <br />setbacks appear to be reasonable; the flat roof design of the boathouse minimizes <br />any potential negative impacts; the existing setbacks; the mature vegetation, and <br />location of neighboring homes separate the buildings from the adjacent neighbors. <br />This criterion is met. <br />b. The plight of the landowneris due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />The Applicant proposes to reconstruct two nonconforming buildings to improve <br />functionality for the owners. The buildings were not constructed by the current <br />owners, or by current construction standards, and are in need of replacing due to <br />their age and deferred maintenance; and <br />c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. " <br />The requested variances will not result in the Property being out of character with <br />the neighborhood; will not expand the footprint of the buildings; or result in <br />additional encroachment into the setbacks toward the lake. The new <br />encroachments will not alter the character of the locality. This criterion is met. <br />4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78." This condition is not applicable. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.