EQB & MN Rules - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

impacts to the value of nearby homes, the Kallivayalils' comments identify parcels that that they assert are more appropriate for the project.22 Boe Carlson, Acting Superintendent of the Three Rivers Park District, submitted comments as the owner and operator of the Baker Regional Park Reserve. Superintendent Carlson wrote to oppose the Baker Reserve routing alternative. He asserts that routing the transmission line through the park reserve would violate the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act, the restrictive covenants placed on the uses for reserve land, and the mission, policies and practices of the Reserve. Additionally, Superintendent Carlson argues that because of the adverse impacts associated with this route alternative — particularly to habitat — that this alternative is an inferior choice to other routing options.23 By way of a follow-on letter, Kelly Grissman, Senior Manager of Planning for the Three Rivers Park District, asserted that the kind of noise assessments made with respect to the proposed substation, should likewise be made as to the noise impacts that would occur if the proposed transmission line were routed along the Baker Reserve routing alternative. Ms. Grissman urges the Commission to direct that these assessments be undertaken if the Baker Reserve routing alternative is "seriously being considered as a viable option ...." She asserts that the removal of buffer areas associated with the proposed alternative would trigger undue noise impacts to those using the park reserve.24 Michael P. Gafforn, Assistant City Administrator, submitted comments on behalf of the City of Orono. Like many of the residents of the Huntington Farms neighborhood, the City expressed concerns over the visual impacts of the proposed substation. Specifically, it urged the Commission to condition any approval of the application on the installation of effective, natural measures to screen the visual impacts of the proposed substation. In its comments it detailed a number of interventions that it regards as necessary — such as the installation of trees of certain types and height. Additionally, the City seeks an opportunity to have its engineer review finalized site plans before project construction begins.25 Jamie Schrenzel, Principal Planner for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' Environmental Review Unit, submitted comments on behalf of the Department. She urged greater coordination between agency permitting activities, in general, and as to this project in particular, because the mitigation measures raise matters of common concern. Specifically, Ms. Schrenzel recommended that the mitigation plans require compliance with the winter construction methods required by Minn. R. 6135.1300, deployment of Swan Flight Diverters along the transmission line 22 See, Comments of Michael and Leena Kallivayalil (December 16, 2011). 23 See, Comments of the Three Rivers Park District (January 5, 2012). 24 See, Comments of the Three Rivers Park District (January 31, 2012). 25 See, Comments of the City of Orono(January 6, 2012). 5