Laserfiche WebLink
Orono Substation Replacement Project Noise Assessment <br /> II <br /> From Figure 4.2 it can be seen that the predicted level at exceeds 40 dBA only when TR#1 is <br /> assumed to be a 78 dBA or 75 dBA transformer. The highest level at Home 5,which is <br /> immediately south of the Orono Substation site across 6th Avenue North,is just below 50 dBA. <br /> Therefore,based upon the assumed transformer sound levels,all of the alternatives are expected <br /> to comply with the L50 50 dBA NNS. <br /> To provide a margin of confidence in the predictions and to bring the predicted levels closer to <br /> the existing ambient level in the area,a concrete sound wall has been evaluated for TR#1. Since <br /> the highest sound levels are expected to be south and west of the proposed substation <br /> replacement,an L-shaped wall south and west of TR#1 was analyzed. Both the south and west <br /> sections for the sound wall are assumed to be 14 feet high and placed 8 feet from the main <br /> transformer surface as shown on Figure 4.3. The south wall would be 36 feet long while the <br /> west wall would be 24 feet long. These lengths also ensure that the homes to the south and west <br /> will receive benefit from the sound wall. <br /> If needed,the sound wall could be provided with sound absorption on the side facing the <br /> transformer to ensure that the sound level is not increased due to the proximity of the wall. <br /> Benefits in sound reduction expected from the wall are presented in Table 4.2 for a 78 dBA <br /> transformer in the TR#1 position. The predicted sound reduction benefits do not include some <br /> limited additional mitigation from installing sound absorption material on the side facing the <br /> transformer. <br /> Table 4.2 Predicted Sound Reduction Benefits of Sound Walls(without Sound <br /> Absorption Material) <br /> With <br /> No Wall Wall Benefit <br /> Home (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) <br /> 1 41.9 36.7 5.2 <br /> 2 40.4 35.4 5.1 <br /> 3 46.2 41.1 5.1 <br /> 4 44.8 40.7 4.0 <br /> 5 49.4 44.3 5.1 <br /> 6 40.3 35.1 5.1 <br /> 7 42.1 36.9 5.2 <br /> From Table 4.2 it can be seen that,all but Home 4 should expect at least a 5 dBA reduction in <br /> sound level,while Home 4 should expect a 4 dBA reduction in sound level. Placing sound <br /> absorption material on the side of the wall facing the transformer can provide some limited <br /> additional sound reduction benefit. <br /> Except for Home 5 located south of the site,predicted sound levels will be close to or within <br /> about 5 dBA of the lowest observed existing level on a winter night(see Figure 4.2). A 16 foot <br /> high wall south of TR#1 could lower the sound level at Home 5. With the addition of a 68 dBA <br /> transformer at the TR#2 position,a 16 foot high wall would be needed to maintain the sound <br /> level at Home 5. Predicted levels and benefits with both the 78 dBA and 68 dBA transformers <br /> with a 16 foot high south wall and 14 foot high west wall are presented in Table 4.3. <br /> David Braslau Associates,Inc. Page 10 <br />