Laserfiche WebLink
Using information from the wetland delineation of the substation site, Xcel Energy has designed the <br />substation to avoid direct impacts to wetlands from the substation. Following the issuance of a <br />route permit Xcel Energy will perform a wetland delineation along the route to determine wetland <br />locations and minimize impacts from the Project. Standard erosion control measures identified in <br />the MPCA Stormwater BMP Manual, such as using silt fencing to minimize impacts on adjacent <br />water resources would be followed (Xcel Energy, 2011a). Practices may include containing <br />excavated material, protecting exposed soil, and stabilizing restored soil. <br />In its route permit application, Xcel Energy has proposed the following mitigation measures: <br />• Spanning wetlands to the greatest extent possible; <br />• Assembling structures on upland areas before they are brought to the site for installation; <br />• Avoid crossing wetlands with construction equipment to the extent possible; <br />• Construction during frozen ground conditions in wetlands to the extent possible; <br />• Construction crews will attempt to access the wetland with the least amount of physical <br />impact to the wetland (i.e., shortest route) and will access poles near or in wetlands from <br />roadways whenever possible to minimize travel through wetland areas; <br />• When construction during winter is not possible, construction mats (wooden mats or a <br />composite mat system) would be used to protect wetland vegetation; and <br />• Use of standard erosion control measures identified in the MPCA Stormwater BMP Manual, <br />such as suing silt fencing to minimize impacts on adjacent water resources. (Xcel Energy, <br />2011 a) <br />Additional mitigation measures could include: <br />• No staging or stringing set up areas will be placed within or adjacent to wetlands or water <br />resources, as practicable. <br />• Restoration of wetland vegetation as soon as possible following construction. <br />5.14 Flora <br />The proposed project is located in the Big Woods Subsection of the Eastern Broadleaf Forest <br />Ecological Province of Minnesota (MnDNR, 2011a). At the time of European settlement, this <br />subsection was characterized by large blocks of oak woodland and maple-bassleaf forest. Land use <br />along the routes reviewed in this document is predominated by residential uses, which incorporates a <br />large block of undeveloped association land, wetlands, and the Baker Park Reserve, which contains a <br />remnant of the pre -settlement Big Woods vegetation. Rare or sensitive plant species and habitat are <br />discussed in Section 5.16. <br />The Project would directly impact to vegetation would be through tree clearing. The Xcel Energy <br />Proposed Route would remove approximately 2.2 acres of trees; depending upon the route <br />alignment in relation to the MnDOT ROW, the Baker Park Reserve Route Alternative remove <br />approximately 2.0 to 2.3 acres of trees (Xcel Energy, personal communications, November 16 and <br />28, 2011). No impacts to identified native plant communities or sensitive plant species are <br />anticipated. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />The primary mitigation strategy to minimize impacts to vegetation is minimizing the extent of tree <br />clearing. Xcel Energy has attempted to minimize the need for tree clearing by overlapping railroad <br />and highway easements to the extent possible. <br />Environmental Assessment <br />PUC Docket E002/TL-11-223 Page 49 <br />