Laserfiche WebLink
The study of cancer in relation to ELF magnetic fields has been a topic of study since the late 1970s. <br />Since that time there have been several epidemiological studies that have explored the possible <br />association of not only cancer risks, including brain tumors, leukemia, and breast cancer, but other <br />potential human maladies including mental health issues. Studies have focused on both <br />occupational exposures for individuals working in electrical industries and public exposures for <br />children and adults living and working around common magnetic field sources (in-home wiring, <br />transmission lines, home and office appliances/equipment). The results of the various studies <br />conducted over the last three decades, specifically those regarding the relationship between EMF <br />and childhood leukemia and other cancer risks, have been mixed; some have found an association <br />while others have not (National Cancer Institute, 2005). <br />Where there is association suggested in epidemiological studies, it is usually very near the statistical <br />threshold of significance. However, when these studies are repeated in a laboratory, the results have <br />not reproduced or identified a biological mechanism to support a link between health impacts and <br />magnetic fields. Researchers continue to look at magnetic fields until more certain conclusions can <br />be reached. <br />In a 2007 report the World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that, although some studies <br />have noted a weak statistical link between exposure to EMF and incidence of childhood leukemia, <br />laboratory evidence does not support these findings and that a similar link has not been noted with <br />other types of cancer: <br />epidemiological evidence is weakened by methodological problems, such as potential selection bias. <br />In addition, there are no accepted biophysical mechanisms that would suggest that lose -level exposures <br />are involved in cancer development. ... Additionally, animal studies have been largely negative. <br />Thus, on balance, the evidence related to childhood leukaemia is not strong enough to be considered <br />causal. ... Re <br />arding long-term effects, given the weakness of the evidence for a link between <br />exposure to ELF extremely low frequency] magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia, the benefits of <br />exposure reduction on health are unclear. (WHO, 2007) <br />Although scientists are still debating whether EMF is a hazard to health, at the current time in the <br />United States, there are no federal standards for occupational or residential exposure to magnetic <br />fields. Florida, New York, and Massachusetts are the only three states in the country that have set <br />standards for magnetic field exposure (Table 10). These standards were not in response to health - <br />based analysis, but rather on maintaining transmission systems within historic levels. <br />The International Commission on Non -Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has developed <br />occupational and residential guidelines for EMF exposure (Table 11). The exposure guidelines <br />established by the ICNIRP have typically been the guidelines adopted by most countries and <br />organizations. They have also concluded that available data regarding potential long-term effects, <br />such as increased risk of cancer, is insufficient to provide a basis for setting exposure restrictions. <br />Xcel Energy prepared estimates of magnetic fields for the structure type and voltage at both average <br />and peak system conditions have been calculated at various distances from the centerline, as <br />presented in Table 14. <br />Environmental Assessment <br />PUC Docket E002/TL-11-223 Page 35 <br />