Laserfiche WebLink
33 <br /> 1 for the south side over the north side because it <br /> 2 doesn ' t affect Baker Park , I would like to <br /> 3 understand and have addressed the issue of why their <br /> 4 concerns are more important than the concerns of the <br /> 5 homeowners . <br /> 6 MR . ED SMITH : Well , I know that - - <br /> 7 MS . SUZANNE STEINHAUER : I don ' t think we <br /> 8 need to - - what I ' m hearing is we don ' t have - - we <br /> 9 don ' t have to answer that , but what I ' m hearing is <br /> 10 there ' s an interest in having other routes <br /> 11 evaluated . And the one that went through Baker <br /> 12 Park , would it be fair to say you would like to have <br /> 13 that evaluated? <br /> 14 MS . MELISSA FOGELBERG : I would like to <br /> 15 have that evaluated . I think that ' s something that <br /> 16 I didn ' t see that it was addressed and I flipped <br /> 17 through this stuff pretty quickly . I don ' t see that <br /> 18 any consideration was given to burying the line . So <br /> 19 why can ' t they bury the line instead of putting <br /> 20 these 100- plus - foot structures across the wetlands <br /> 21 and in our line of view? <br /> 22 I thought it was interesting they didn ' t <br /> 23 call it visual impact , they called it a point of <br /> 24 visual interest . Well , some of us would not enjoy <br /> 25 having a point of visual interest in our backyard . <br />