Laserfiche WebLink
28 <br /> 1 else is not a part of the record , but what I ' m <br /> 2 hearing from this is that ' s something we need to get <br /> 3 into the record and probably the environmental <br /> 4 assessment is the best place to do that . <br /> 5 MR . CHRIS ROGERS : Suzanne , Mr . Wilson , I <br /> 6 don ' t know if your question was answered about the <br /> 7 difference in footprints . The current fenced area <br /> 8 versus what ' s proposed , I ' ve put Jeff ' s glasses on <br /> 9 here , the existing fenced areas that ' s there today <br /> 10 is 86 by 51 ; 86 north and south , 51 east and west . <br /> 11 The proposed would be - - it ' s not a square , but <br /> 12 roughly 241 by 240 . And that would be the fenced <br /> 13 area and , of course , that all sits within the <br /> 14 16 - acre marker that we own . <br /> 15 MS . MELISSA FOGELBERG : Melissa <br /> 16 Fogelberg , again . And I guess I ' ve got a number of <br /> 17 questions I ' ve just jotted down , I don ' t know if <br /> 18 it ' s appropriate to include them in the scoping or <br /> 19 not . But if it is I ' d like to have them answered , <br /> 20 and if it ' s not I ' d still like to have them <br /> 21 answered . <br /> 22 Maybe I can just kind of run through <br /> 23 them . One question would be what alternative <br /> 24 locations were considered , not just what different <br /> 25 routes through this existing parcel but what <br />