Laserfiche WebLink
' Resolution of South St. Paul Page 3 of 5 <br /> I2.10 Opponents expressed concern that the new transmission line will result in devaluing property adjacent to <br /> the line and make the property unusable or difficult to sell.The FHA will not finance houses adjacent to <br /> I transmission lines.NSP stated that FHA has financed house sales adjacent to transmission lines upon receiving <br /> advice from NSP that the line was constructed according to all applicable codes and requirements. <br /> I 2.11 A study by Colliers Towle,Inc. of sale price comparisons among houses adjacent to transmission lines and <br /> those not adjacent to transmission lines average. Those adjacent to a line sold on the average for 0.5 percent less <br /> and took an average of 5.5 days longer to sell. <br /> I 2.12 Some of the opponents were concerned about adverse health effects to persons living adjacent to the <br /> transmission line that may be caused by the electric and magnetic fields of the transmission line. They are <br /> fearful of the levels of these fields even though double circuiting will reduce these levels by about fifty percent. <br /> I2.13 NSP, on the other hand, refers to the decision of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board concerning <br /> this project in which it determined that the proposed project does not have the potential for significant <br /> Ienvironmental effects and issued a negative declaration on the need for an environmental impact statement. <br /> 2.14 It appears that the scientific community has not conclusively demonstrated a lack of causal relationship <br /> I <br /> between EMF and adverse health effects and that research about this issue continues. The research to date is <br /> inconclusive with regard to the issue of transmission lines and adverse health effects. <br /> 2.15 The estimated cost of construction of the double-circuit overhead 115kv transmission line through the <br /> I <br /> residential portion in the City of South St. Paul is $390,000;the estimated cost to underground the same <br /> segment is $5,000,000. <br /> I 2.16 The Proposed construction schedule for the Red Rock to Rogers Lake segment of the project is fall 2001- <br /> winter 2002 Red Rock substation construction,winter 2002-spring 2003 Rogers Lake substation line <br /> foundations and structures construction <br /> I <br /> I SECTION THREE <br /> Conclusions <br /> 3.01 This matter is properly before the City Council pursuant to Subsection 1500.29, Subd. 4,of the South St. <br /> I <br /> Paul City Code of 1992. <br /> 3.02 All persons who desired to be heard in favor or in opposition to the Application have been given an <br /> Iopportunity to present evidence and argument. <br /> 3.03 There is credible evidence of the need for the project. <br /> 1 3.04 The general characteristics of the residential neighborhood will not change because the configuration of an <br /> existing transmission line will only change. The monopoles will be approximately 25 feet higher than the <br /> I existing H-frame structures and will be the same number.However, the monopoles will be significantly more <br /> visible in the local community and will have a greater impact on the landscape than the existing structures. If <br /> the proposed double circuit line was constructed underground,the visual impact would be eliminated. <br /> I 3.05 There will be diminution or impairment of property values and FHA insured loans may not be available <br /> because of the presence of the transmission line <br /> I 3.06 Noise levels will increase by approximately five decibels because of the proposed transmission line. Noise <br /> levels will not be a concern if the double circuit line is constructed underground. <br /> Ihttp://www.powerlinefacts.com/South%20St%20Paul%20Resolution.htm 4/19/2011 <br />