Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 4.2 Previously Recorded Standing Structures <br /> Nineteen historic properties have been inventoried within the Study Area as part of various cultural <br /> ' resources inventories. Several rural properties within the Study Area were recommended for further <br /> evaluation during the previous resource studies but have not been subjected to such studies as of the <br /> completion of this literature review. None of the historic properties are located within the 400 foot <br /> Proposed Route width, with the nearest being approximately <br /> away, and will not be <br /> impacted by construction activities. <br /> 4.3 Previously Conducted Cultural Resources Surveys <br /> The reports for eight cultural resources inventories in the Study Area were reviewed. Another <br /> ' report submitted in 2003 was unable to be located during the March 2011 visits to the SHPO. A <br /> 1988 Reconnaissance NRHP Survey of 26 Municipalities in Hennepin County for the SHPO <br /> covered portions of the cultural resources Study Area documenting several standing structures. <br /> Several structures were recorded as potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP;however,none of the <br /> properties recorded for the 1988 report relating to this Project will be adversely impacted. <br /> Two reports document the Minnesota Trunk Highway Archaeological Reconnaissance Studies of <br /> 1993 and 1994. The Project location was covered within one of 8 segments where a 500 foot wide <br /> survey corridor was implemented. None of the sites recorded within these reports and relating to <br /> this Project are listed as potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP. <br /> The 106 Group conducted Phase II evaluations of two structures relating to reconstruction of <br /> County State Aid Highway ("CSAH") 6 in 1994. Both of the previously identified properties were <br /> found to be not eligible for listing in the NRHP. <br /> In 1995,a final report was submitted to the Minnesota Historical Society as part of the Trunk <br /> Highway Cultural Resource Program (Mather et. al. 1995) summarizing the results of surveys for <br /> several alternatives relating to improvements to U.S. Highway 12. Several archaeological sites were <br /> recorded as part of this survey,including 21HE0162,which falls within one of the Alternate Routes <br /> for this Project but outside of the 400 foot Proposed Route width. <br /> ' In 1997, the 106 Group submitted a Phase I report for the proposed reconstruction of CSAH 6 <br /> from Townline Road to U.S. Highway 12. The extreme southern extent of the 16 acre substation <br /> parcel was covered as part of this survey with a result of no findings. <br /> ' Phase II evaluations were conducted prior to improvements to U.S. Highway 12 in 1998 on two <br /> sites outside of the proposed 400 foot route width and existing substation site for the Project,but <br /> within the one mile cultural resources Study Area. BRW,Inc. found both sites to be not eligible for <br /> listing in the NRHP;however,a reported undocumented Euro-American burial at site 21HE0288 <br /> was recommended for monitoring during construction activities. Site 21HE0288 is approximately <br /> ' -away from the proposed Project. <br /> Orono Project Phase Ia Literature Review April,2011 <br /> MPUC Docket No. E002/TL-11-223 13 <br />