Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 1 <br /> 4.0 MINNESOTA STATE SITE FILES <br /> 4.1 Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites 1 <br /> A total of 15 archaeological sites have been previously recorded within one mile of the alignment of <br /> the Study Area (see Figure 4). Of the 15 archaeological sites, thirteen are pre-contact and consist of: <br /> six lithic scatters, two artifact scatters, three single artifact finds, and two American Indian <br /> earthworks. The remaining two sites consist of post-contact historic structural ruins with associated <br /> artifact scatters. None of the previously recorded sites are listed in the Nation Register Considered <br /> Eligible Findings ("CEF") by the SHPO. A total of 19 previously recorded historic architectural <br /> properties were identified within the Study Area (see Figure 4). Of the 19 historic architectural 1 <br /> properties none are listed on the NRHP or CEF. A summary of the inventoried archaeological and <br /> architectural sites is provided in Table 1. <br /> Because the Project is located in close proximity to Lake Minnetonka which is a highly sensitive <br /> archaeological area, and within one mile of documented Native American earthworks, it has the <br /> potential to contain additional pre-contact cultural resources. However, much of the proposed <br /> Project and transmission line route lies near or within wetland areas making traditional survey <br /> methods nearly impossible in these locations. Under these circumstances, where traditional survey <br /> methods prior to the start of construction are difficult to undertake, URS recommends that Xcel <br /> Energy has an unanticipated discovery plan in place prior to the start of construction. The <br /> unanticipated discovery plan should outline procedures to follow, in accordance with state and <br /> federal laws, if archaeological materials or human remains are discovered prior or during <br /> construction. <br /> The two American Indian earthworks (21HE0184, and 21HEam) located within the cultural <br /> resources study area warrant special discussion as they are protected under Minn. Stat. Section <br /> 307.08 of Minnesota's "Private Cemeteries" Act. While it is known that not all earthworks contain <br /> human burials, they are protected as such until authenticated by the Office of the State <br /> Archaeologist (OSA) and the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council (MIAC). Neither of the earthworks <br /> located in the cultural resources Study Area have been authenticated. Of the two sites, one is <br /> located approximately- away from its nearest point to the Proposed Route width and the <br /> other is approximately _ away from its nearest point to the Proposed Route. Given the <br /> distance between these sites and the proposed construction activities, no impacts are anticipated. <br /> Based on recent aerial photographs, it appears that an existing transmission line passes along the 1 <br /> northern boundary of site 21HE0184, and a portion of site 21HEam may have been destroyed by <br /> residential development. <br /> 1 <br /> Orono Project Phase Ia Literature Review April,2011 1 <br /> MPUC Docket No. E002/TL-11-223 10 <br /> i <br /> 1 <br />