Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> ' 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK <br /> In Minnesota,no person may construct a high-voltage transmission line without a route permit from <br /> ' the Public Utilities Commission under Minnesota Statute 216E.03, subdivision 2. A high-voltage <br /> transmission line is defined as a conductor of electric energy and associated facilities designed for <br /> and capable of operation at a nominal voltage of 100 kV or more and is greater than 1,500 feet in <br /> ' length. Associated facilities of the transmission line include buildings,equipment,and other physical <br /> structures that are necessary to the operation of a high-voltage transmission line. <br /> ' 2.1 Certificate of Need <br /> Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 216B.243,subdivision 2,"No large energy facility shall be sited or <br /> constructed in Minnesota without the issuance of a certificate of need by the Commission." In the <br /> 111 <br /> case of a high-voltage transmission line,a large energy facility is defined as, (1) any high-voltage <br /> transmission line with a capacity of 200 kV or more and greater than 1,500 feet in length,and (2) any <br /> high-voltage transmission line with a capacity of 100 kV or more with more than ten miles of its <br /> length in Minnesota or that crosses a state line. <br /> The project as proposed,a 115 kV transmission line with a length of less than one mile,does not <br /> ' qualify as a large energy facility and a certificate of need is not required. <br /> 2.2 Alternative Permitting Process <br /> ' The proposed project is eligible for consideration under the alternative permitting process <br /> (Minnesota Rule 7850.2800) of the Power Plant Siting Act(Minnesota Statute 216E.04). The <br /> alternative permitting process is shorter than the full permitting procedures and does not require the <br /> applicant to propose alternative sites or routes to the preferred site or route,but does require the <br /> applicant to disclose rejected route alternatives and an explanation of why they were rejected. <br /> ' 2.3 Route Permit Application <br /> The applicant filed a route permit application with the Commission for the Project on June 7,2011. <br /> ' The Commission accepted the application as complete in an order issued on June 30,2011. Under <br /> the alternative permitting process,the Commission has six months to issue a route permit from the <br /> date a route permit application is deemed complete. The Commission may extend this time limit for <br /> ' up to three months for just cause or upon agreement of the applicant. <br /> 2.4 Public Information and Scoping Meeting <br /> ' EFP staff held a public information and environmental assessment scoping meeting on August 10, <br /> 2011,at the Orono City Hall in Orono,Minnesota,as required by Minnesota Rule 7850.3500. The <br /> meeting provided the public an opportunity to learn about the proposed project and the state's high- <br /> voltage transmission line route permitting process,review the applicant's route permit application, <br /> ask questions,and submit comments. <br /> ' A court reporter was present at the public meeting and transcribed questions asked and comments <br /> made by the public,as well as responses from EFP staff and Xcel Energy (Department of <br /> Commerce,2011a). Approximately seven members of the public attended the meeting. <br /> ' A public comment period,ending on August 26,2011,also provided the public an opportunity to <br /> submit comments on issues and alternative routes for consideration in the scope of the EA. Four <br /> 1 Environmental Assessment <br /> PUC Docket E002/TL-11-223 Page 3 <br />