|
• Date Application Received: 07/21/2021
<br /> Date Application Considered as Complete:07/30/2021 -V _O.Ai
<br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/28/2021
<br /> $14.,..
<br /> To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members y
<br /> Adam Edwards, City Administrator `°� �
<br /> 4kESHOR‘`'
<br /> From: Laura Oakden, LLO
<br /> Date: August 16, 2021
<br /> Subject: LA21-000054, Sharratt Design & Co-Michael Sharrat, 2695 Shadywood Road,
<br /> Variance, Public Hearing
<br /> Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an Average Lakeshore Setback (ALS)
<br /> variance to permit the addition and deck improvements to the house to be lakeward of ALS.
<br /> Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the variance as
<br /> proposed.
<br /> Background
<br /> The existing principle home on the property is nonconforming to the average lakeshore setback.
<br /> The applicant is requesting to build a 3 season porch and deck addition along the east side of
<br /> the home.The proposed roofline of the addition will be lower than the roofline of the existing
<br /> • home maintain the same defined height of the home. The project is proposed to be lakeward
<br /> of the average lakeshore setback. All other city codes are met with the project.
<br /> Practical Difficulties Analysis Bo oR, i
<br /> Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant has ,'. / ("y,' Ni>
<br /> identified lack of a building envelope for the current . ' o ,o° h'
<br /> 6 22 SPRUCE
<br /> property and the location of the neighboring home as ',` `, -
<br /> practical difficulties supporting the requested
<br /> q�S. y`' Fq 1�
<br /> •
<br /> variance. Additionally,they have provided supporting 'sem.- ',=*w <, ., esPRucE
<br /> documentation regarding Practical Difficulties vD�'i`� •,...;,- 36,--, Average Lakeshore
<br /> PRU6E
<br /> g g 2. ,• R Exis-nto3 Setback
<br /> attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for ---.-- -- . SE a ,\' .`, ,-''"r • `
<br /> e SPRUCE
<br /> additional testimony regarding the application. <r P,nO` .5 _T`A' ,6',(F(
<br /> �'tA UCE
<br /> Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Staff � , s rv+es4MA?1.1'4!.f,`c
<br /> agrees with the applicants arguments for practical s Ees ,--ewsaao � �
<br /> difficulty due to the extreme setback on the 2 ' ,� n},,�. proposed Addition
<br /> neighboring home which eliminates a viable building 75 Lake setback � ,;, ��. ,
<br /> envelope for the property. The property is unique > �'-_;j / ,p
<br /> for the neighborhood due to the depth of the parcel .�'so, t `\ ' - ,
<br /> (roughly 170') compared to the neighboring lots -.....,'0:7,' Mt �, \,./, .w '`
<br /> beingover 300' in depth. The deeper lots allow the ",..,..7-20 ,,1, . ,,ti , r -
<br /> P p2y c>••`
<br /> home to be built farther away from the lake creating �`�1--,
<br /> an extreme average lakeshore setback for the subject --.„ ,<,`'s,1 -
<br /> property. Staff supports the variance request. `t-,-<� , 15 MOE LAKE ACCES£
<br /> , i
<br /> FOR LOT 1 PER DOC.N
<br />
|