My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-14-2021 City Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2021
>
06-14-2021 City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2021 3:08:17 PM
Creation date
6/30/2021 3:08:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 14,2021 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 16. ORONO MOUNTAIN BIKE TEAM USE OF BEDERWOOD PARK—Continued <br /> Olson spoke with Ms. Schmidt's attorney for a few minutes and sent him what was on this evening's <br /> agenda. <br /> Johnson said they will get the property line identified so it eliminates any concern about trespassing. <br /> Ms. Schmidt does not think that would take care of it. <br /> Johnson noted it is a good start. <br /> Ms. Schmidt agreed and is glad the City Council is looking at it; she thinks a lot more needs to be looked <br /> at because it has been less than a month and she found out by accident. She would like neighbors and <br /> everyone to know and look at this. <br /> Mayor Walsh said parks are always a moving piece of property as the City is always making them better. <br /> The best thing to do is always be in communication,including the Parks Director and Parks Commission <br /> Chair;they are always looking for new thoughts and ideas of what they can do to make them better all the <br /> time. <br /> Ms. Schmidt said that is great to hear and thanked the Council. <br /> Seals moved,Crosby seconded,to approve the attached Resolution No. 7195 designating <br /> Bederwood Park as a designated pathway area for mountain bike use,including marking of the <br /> property line.VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT <br /> 19. LA21-000030—TOM BERGSTROM, 1509 LONG LAKE BLVD,VARIANCES <br /> Curtis presented a summary packet of information to the Council and said the property owner is <br /> requesting rear setback and 75-foot lake setback variances in order to expand the existing deck by 227 <br /> square feet(including staircase).The property owner has indicated a willingness to remove an 80 square <br /> foot deck/patio within the 75-foot setback to facilitate approval of the requested variances and offset 75- <br /> foot hardcover.In May the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing the <br /> Planning Commission voted 7-0 to deny the variances.Planning Staff recommends denial of the <br /> requested variances to enlarge the deck within the lake setback as the property has reasonable use with the <br /> existing improvements.The requested lake setback variance is not supported by practical difficulty. Staff <br /> would support a rear setback variance if it is out of the lake setback.Tonight the Council should consider <br /> directing Staff to draft a resolution reflecting their decision. <br /> Mayor Walsh said if the Applicant is willing to give up 85 or 100 feet to grab 16 feet to make the deck in <br /> this weird site work,it seems like a pretty reasonable trade-off.His question is,this house is only a few <br /> years old and obviously had to have variances to build the house. In that variance request,did the City <br /> tell him to remove all the 0-75 that was already there? <br /> Curtis noted Laura Oakden handled the variance for the home and she does not know the conversations, <br /> but the City was not able to require him to remove it.He was allowed to keep it as an existing non- <br /> Page 6 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.