My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
06-21-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2021 8:12:59 AM
Creation date
6/22/2021 7:51:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,May 17,2021 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Doug Johnson,200 SE University Ave,Minneapolis,said there is currently no plumbing in the detached <br /> garage and the owners would like to use it for an office and would like a toilet and sink,there will be no <br /> shower. <br /> Kirchner asked if the owner would be okay with the Commission adding a covenant added that a shower <br /> not be added. <br /> Mr. Johnson replied 100%. <br /> Barnhart noted they should be cautious about adding conditions that are not germane to the application in <br /> front of the Commission. The applicant has the right to have certain plumbing and covenants are in place. <br /> The reason Staff did not suggest a covenant is because they did not a see the need;obviously the Code <br /> still prevails so if there is a future building permit with plumbing,then they would add that as a <br /> requirement. <br /> Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 6:32 p.m. <br /> Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 6:32 p.m. <br /> Libby asked if this is sewered. <br /> Curtis replied yes, it is sewered. <br /> Ressler said generally speaking to trigger the covenant, is it at the time of rough building inspection and <br /> does it then come back to the Commission? <br /> Curtis replied when they apply for the permit and show features on the plan the applicant is required to <br /> provide a covenant prior to issuance of the permit. The covenant is dependent upon the noted features that <br /> will be roughed in. They would not be able to proceed if they did not have a covenant; it would not come <br /> back to the Commission as it is just a covenant at the Staff level. <br /> Ressler noted that includes a shower,as well. <br /> Curtis answered that is true. <br /> Ressler is on board with the applicant as applied. <br /> Ressler moved,Bollis seconded,to approve LA21-000031,724 Tonkawa Rd,Variance as applied. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. <br /> 3. LA21-000032 AL AZAD, 165 BEDERWOOD DR,VARIANCES <br /> Al Azad,Applicant,was present. <br /> Staff presented a summary packet of information(Item 3 on the Agenda under Public Hearings). The <br /> applicant is requesting approvals in order to redevelop the property with a new single <br /> family home. Requested variances are for the following: lot area, lot width,and front and rear setback. <br /> Staff finds the LR-1A zoning district requirements, lot size,width, and the unique configuration without <br /> Page 5 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.