My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
05-17-2021 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2021 8:48:52 AM
Creation date
5/18/2021 8:35:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Date Application Received: April 21,2021 <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete:April 21,2021 8ZLOAio <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: June 20,2021 <br /> To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members <br /> Adam Edwards, City Administrator <br /> ikESHO'1" <br /> From: Jeremy Barnhart,AICP, Community Development <br /> Director <br /> Date: May 17, 2021 <br /> Subject: #LA21-000035, Darrin Rosha o/b/o Orono Station West, LLC, 2160 Wayzata Blvd <br /> West, Variances from sign ordinance <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances from the sign ordinance to <br /> support a rebranding of the existing gas station. The variances include the number of free <br /> standing signs, monument sign area, sign copy area, changeable copy area, canopy signage <br /> area, and lighting of the canopy. <br /> Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the number of <br /> free standing signs, and the number of canopy signs. Staff does not support the sign area <br /> proposed,and the lighting of the canopy. If the sign area is not approved,staff does not support <br /> the changeable copy,or the monument sign area. <br /> Practical Difficulties Analysis <br /> Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant suggests that the unique use of the property(a <br /> mall with several different land uses), the limited frontage, and the variance history of the <br /> property are practical difficulties supporting the requested variances. Finally,the applicant has <br /> provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds there are <br /> some practical difficulties supporting the second free standing sign because of the unique mall <br /> use of the property. <br /> • The sign area of the structure (66"x 209") is 95.79 sq ft,greater than allowed by <br /> precedent (63 sq ft), ordinance (45 sq ft),and proposed ordinance (45 sq ft). There are <br /> no practical difficulties to support a variance of this magnitude. <br /> • The monument sign area of 141.66 sq ft (240"x 85") is less than 150%of the sign area <br /> proposed,though in excess of the 67.5 sq ft anticipated as a maximum monument sign <br /> area. If the City approves the sign area variance,this variance is moot. <br /> • The changeable copy of the sign, excluding the fuel prices is 21%of the proposed sign <br /> area,within the 35% maximum, but in excess of the 16 sq ft anticipated by ordinance. If <br /> the City approves the sign area variance,this variance is moot. <br /> • The uniqueness of the lot,on a curved part of the road, and the shape of the canopy <br /> supports variances for the additional canopy signs. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.