My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2021 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2020-2024
>
2021
>
04-12-2021 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2021 9:06:20 AM
Creation date
5/6/2021 9:06:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING • <br /> Monday,April 12,2021 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 16. LA21-000016—Schimmel Construction o/b/o David & Kathryn Wiemer, 1405 Rest Point Road, <br /> Variances—Continued <br /> David and Kathryn Wiemer thanked the Council and said the feedback and guidance from the Planning <br /> Commission and Ms. Curtis has been extremely helpful to come up with the revised plan. Given the <br /> challenges of the lot with the lake and road setbacks,the revised plan now meets that 25%hardcover <br /> requirement and will also work for the goal of having a four season porch and have a deck to enjoy the <br /> outdoor areas of the yard without sinking in to the ground in their chairs. <br /> Johnson moved,Seals seconded,to approve LA21-000016, 1405 Rest Point Road,Variances <br /> VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> 17. LA21-000017—Joseph& Sara Thull,480 Big Island,Permit for Dock City on ROW(Bay Place) <br /> Joseph& Sara Thull,Applicants,were present. <br /> Barnhart presented a summary packet of information and said the Applicants are owners of an inland lot <br /> on Big Island and have requested a permit to place a dock on City right-of-way as allowed by Section 78- <br /> 567. They have been unable to locate a suitable private easement agreement and are asking for the <br /> permit. The proposed location of the dock coincides with another dock and the approval for that dock in <br /> • <br /> 1986 was approved with a condition that any other request for a dock revokes that permit issued. <br /> Planning Commission heard testimony and ultimately voted to deny the request with a vote of 5-1-1. <br /> There has been significant public interest in this application. The staff report summarizes the main <br /> concerns including a lot of record buildability,tree removal,wetland issues,and access for construction. <br /> Based on the standards in the code, Staff recommends approval subject to the six conditions outlined in <br /> the staff memo,which includes the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District(LMCD)approval. The <br /> permit is to be valid for one year and can then be reevaluated as necessary. The dockage rights <br /> accommodate two boats. Winter storage for the dock would be approved by City Staff as it likely would <br /> be impactful of some of the right-of-way in that area. Staff also suggests a minimum width for the dock <br /> of six feet and no canopy included. Barnhart noted this project identified the need to look at the dock use <br /> for all of these inland lots comprehensively and Staff is looking for feedback from the Council to look <br /> into that solution long-term. <br /> Walsh was at the Planning Commission meeting and said personally,he is not here today to make any big <br /> decisions about this item. What they have found out is that sometimes there are code issues and they do <br /> not always realize are problems,or they are not written correctly and until something pops up,people do <br /> not realize it. He believes this code is one of those issues and thinks it was written specifically because <br /> for someone to have a dock on public property,they cannot just claim that indefinitely forever. Walsh <br /> said that is why it was put in that the dock permit could be cancelled if someone else applied;the problem <br /> is someone else could do the same to that person with the dock permit,and another person,and it would <br /> just continue. He thinks they need to find a resolution for this. On Big Island,the families that have been <br /> out there for decades,everything has worked just fine;obviously they do have an issue on interior lots. <br /> Walsh thinks what it tells the current family that has that dock is that it is not a permanent dock for the • <br /> family;they could not ever mortgage the property and say they have dock rights or sell the property with <br /> Page 4 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.