Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
FILE#LA21-000023 <br /> 19 April 2021 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET • <br /> Section 78-350—Garage Setbacks: <br /> LR-1C Required Existing Proposed <br /> Rear 10' 11.5' 10' <br /> West Side 7.5' <br /> 3.6' 7.5'garage <br /> 4'stair <br /> 10. 'grage <br /> East Side 7.5' <br /> 6.8'1staiar/landing 4.5' <br /> Section 78-350—Lot Area/Width: <br /> LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width <br /> Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' <br /> Actual 10,965 s.f. (0.25 acre)* 53' @ 75'/60' @ OHWL <br /> *after subtraction of 966 s.f. blacktop area of Crystal Bay Road <br /> Section 78-1403—Structural Building Coverage: <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br /> 10,965 s.f. (0.25 acre) Allowed: 2,193 s.f. (20%) <br /> Existing: 1,466 s.f. (13.3%) <br /> Proposed: 1,548 s.f. (14.1%) <br /> Section 78-1700—Hardcover Calculations: <br /> Stormwater <br /> Overlay District Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed <br /> Tier <br /> Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> Tier 1 10,965 s.f. 2,741 s.f. 4,134 s.f. 4,085 s.f. <br /> (25%) (37.7%) (37.3%) <br /> Applicable Regulations: <br /> Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700) <br /> The applicant is proposing 37.3%total site hardcover where 25%is permitted; 1,344 square feet <br /> more than allowed but a 49 square foot reduction from the existing level. <br /> The garage footprint is proposed to be increased from 20'x 22'to 22'x 24'to accommodate more <br /> reasonably sized vehicles. The 2-car garage is proposed with an 18 foot-wide overhead door.The <br /> driveway is 19 feet wide,the minimum required for that door width. The overall hardcover will be <br /> reduced by 49 square feet with the removals proposed as part of the project.There are limited <br /> parking opportunities due to the property's location along Crystal Bay Road and with access along <br /> the Dakota Trail easement area. <br /> Side Setback Variance (Section 78-350) <br /> The proposed garage is shown to conform to the west and rear setbacks.The applicant has received <br /> supporting comments from the property owner to the east where the 4.5 foot setback is proposed <br /> (Exhibit F). An accessory shed on the property to the east appears to mitigate visual impacts of the <br /> reduced setback. The elevation difference from the rear requires that the stairway be replaced. In <br /> moving the stair from the east to the west side of the garage,the applicant is able to reduce • <br /> hardcover for the pathway in addition to removal of the walls which encroach into the Dakota Rail <br /> property. Supportive comments have also been received from the neighbor to the west where the <br />