My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-15-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
03-15-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2021 9:00:38 AM
Creation date
4/20/2021 8:59:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Tuesday,March 15,2021 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> bigger story than simply accessing the lake via one particular location. To that end, there are a couple of <br /> access points on the west bay, four on the east bay and asked how is this all going to look? They certainly <br /> do not want to have a marina next to their property and if that becomes the access point for all inland <br /> properties on the island,that would be a significant concern. He thinks what would be fair is west going to <br /> the west and east going to the east. From a larger standpoint they then discuss the strategy of all the inland <br /> owners as opposed to simply one. <br /> Suzy and Peter Thiss, 270 Big Island, have thoughts of one land owner, one boat, one slip. She does not <br /> understand the wording that Fred and Nancy's dock permit can be revoked;does that mean Fred and Nancy <br /> can revoke it from the Thu11 family next year? <br /> Ressler noted that is one of his questions, as well. Again, they have to speculate because it was several <br /> years ago that it was issued, but he ventures a guess that the reason it is worded that way is because they <br /> want the opportunity to revisit that permit at the same time of issuing another one; and that is the trigger <br /> for the event. If there is another application for a dock,they want to be able to change the approval or the <br /> use of that—that is the only speculation he might have. It will probably come up in the discussion among <br /> the Commissioners. Ressler does not think it is a black and white situation where now there has been an <br /> application, one loses their rights to a dock. He thinks it becomes more of a situation where it is revisited <br /> because of the trigger. <br /> Ms. Thiss noted it is a very passive, quiet place with deer, foxes, and all kinds of things in that meadow. <br /> She noted everyone enjoys it, and so does nature. The whole idea of making it a multiple dock or dock <br /> sharing,Ms.Thiss does not think it is a marina and thinks that the Power Squadron is a super viable option <br /> for someone who needs to get to their place,use a bathroom,take a shower, as all those facilities are there. <br /> She stated the whole idea that someone can put up a cabin and not cut down trees and make more paths...this <br /> past year there were ATVs going around the island with chain saws at night and there were people cutting <br /> paths and running the camouflaged 4-wheelers like crazy. She noted that is the kind of stuff she would hate <br /> to see because there is so little land in the City, it is important to preserve Big Island and to look 10-15 <br /> years down the road and keep it that way. <br /> Ted Hanna, 490 Big Island, said his parents have owned the property since 1968 and he got it about 10 <br /> years ago. He would be a little concerned about having some access in the future. He lived over in <br /> Greenwood until about a year ago so it was mostly just winter ski access for him with a tent platform and <br /> a teepee. He noted it would be great to get out there and visit some more—they do not have a family cabin <br /> which used to be on the south side of all this for years. He would ask that some kind of solution might be <br /> figured out for some kind of dock access. He noted one comment mentioned a piece of land where Three <br /> Rivers is—he asked if that would ever be up for imminent domain. <br /> Curtis clarified the piece of land that is blocking the right-of-way continuation used to be all one little sliver. <br /> Mr. Hanna sees that those pieces are now deeded to the adjacent landowners. <br /> Curtis replied that is right and this one is owned by Three Rivers and they have declined—she believes one <br /> of those reasons is the funding source that they used to purchase the property prohibits granting an easement <br /> or selling it for any of those uses. <br /> Mr. Hanna asked the Thulls if they have thought about using something down on that side. He noted he <br /> may be in front of the Commission in the future to try to figure something out, as well. <br /> Page 8 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.