My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-15-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
03-15-2021 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2021 9:00:38 AM
Creation date
4/20/2021 8:59:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Tuesday,March 15,2021 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> ROLL CALL <br /> The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: <br /> Chair Jon Ressler, Commissioners Chris Bollis, Bob Erickson, Matt Gellman, Scott Kirchner, Dennis <br /> Libby, and Mark McCutcheon. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Jeremy <br /> Barnhart, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and City Planner Laura Oakden. City Council representative Matt <br /> Johnson was also present. <br /> Chair Ressler called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. <br /> APPROVAL OF AGENDA <br /> Libby moved,Bollis seconded,to approve the Agenda.VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. <br /> APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 16,2021 <br /> Kirchner moved,McCutcheon seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission <br /> meeting of January 19,2021 as submitted.VOTE:Ayes 7,Nays 0. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> 1. LA21-000016 SCHIMMEL CONSTRUCTION, 1405 REST POINT RD, VARIANCES (STAFF: <br /> MELANIE CURTIS) <br /> David&Kathryn Wiemer,Applicants,were present. <br /> Staff presented a summary packet of information. Curtis stated the Applicant proposes to build a 125 square <br /> foot addition on the south side of the home and an approximate 500 square foot deck on the lakeside. The <br /> addition is shown on screen in red and the deck is shown in yellow on the survey. The property is non- <br /> conforming with respect to area,width,hard cover,and setbacks. The entire home is located within the 75- <br /> foot setback from the lake. The proposed addition is shown to encroach within the 30-foot rear street <br /> setback and the 75-foot lake setback. The deck is shown within the 75 foot and average lakeshore setbacks. <br /> Existing hardcover on the level today is 22.7%with almost all of the hardcover within the 75-foot setback. <br /> The 75-foot setback is the line that starts here [noted on screen] and goes diagonally through the driveway. <br /> The Applicant is proposing an increase of approximately 604 square feet for 27.2% total site hardcover. <br /> Hardcover, lake setback, average lakeshore setback (ALS), and rear street setback variances would be <br /> required. Curtis noted the lake and rear street setbacks overlap eliminating the buildable area, creating a <br /> practical difficulty for development of the lot. The existing home has an approximate 2,000 square foot <br /> footprint which does result in reasonable use of the property. The 500 square foot deck and 125 square foot <br /> addition are relatively minimal, however, result in additional encroachments in both the rear and lake <br /> setback areas and add to the non-conforming hardcover on the property. The neighboring home to the north <br /> is located approximately 30 feet from the lake, determining the ALS which is not shown on the survey but <br /> she can provide an aerial photo. The Applicant's proposal results in additional encroachments with the <br /> deck proposed at 23 feet and the addition to the home as close as 45 feet to the lake. Staff has received no <br /> public comments on the application. The practical difficulty analysis was provided in the Staff report; <br /> regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds that there are no practical difficulties supporting the current <br /> variances to further encroach within the required setbacks to increase the total site hardcover above 25%or <br /> to place a deck within the ALS. In summary, Planning Staff recommends denial of the variances as <br /> proposed. <br /> Page 1 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.