My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2021
>
01-11-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2021 9:58:12 AM
Creation date
4/15/2021 9:55:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 7, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 9 of 15 <br /> <br />24. LA20-000071 – Jacob Stickney, 15 Stubbs Bay Road/PID 3211823340006, Variances – <br />Resolution – Continued <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh said the neighbor is basically 18 feet from the property line and just wanted the other house <br />to be 18 feet, kind of equidistant. <br /> <br />Johnson noted the other component that came up at the Planning Commission was if they decide to put a <br />deck on, they will need to get a variance application to do it. <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden said there is a deck contemplated as part of this plan, and noted it is right under the red line <br />onscreen. <br /> <br />George Stickney, 340 Peavey Road, representing the Dunn Family, who will be selling the property to the <br />buyer building this house, said as they can see with the constraints of the lot something has to be done; <br />every one of the lots to the north, including the Krumps who have agreed to say this is suitable, have <br />a15.5 setback on one side and are closer than 15 feet, 27 feet on one side and their barn is 19 feet. The <br />neighbor just above them has a 13-foot setback on one of the buildings on a 2-acre lot. There is another <br />2.4-acre lot which is closer to the street than this property. In looking at the exception past the property, <br />there is a silly driveway access up off of Watertown Road, so there is another 33 feet of woods that will <br />stay there. He mentioned at the Planning Commission meeting, if they built that driveway it would be so <br />costly, they would never do it. He noted they would have to clear cut all the trees and go up a mountain <br />to get to the house. He said this is a really nice plan and everyone seems to be in favor now that the <br />Krumps are. <br /> <br />Crosby asked what the total size of the lot is. <br /> <br />Mr. Stickney replied it is 1.22 acres, the lot to the north is 1.22 acres, and the other two lots are 2.48 acres <br />and they all fail and are closer to the road than this property except one of the homes. He said they kept <br />this house 50 feet from the road and that is good; if they kick it back any further that is where the septic <br />has to be. They are already placing the front setback beyond the line of the other properties to the north. <br /> <br />Johnson moved, Seals seconded, to approve LA20-000071, 15 Stubbs Bay Road/PID <br />3211823340006, Variances – Resolution. Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br />27. Authorize Text Amendment Related to Special Lot Combinations <br /> <br />Barnhart said this request is an authorization to start the review process, as over the past few weeks they <br />have received requests for special lot combination. He noted they have done this in the past, but looking <br />at the code to gauge whether or not it is an appropriate special lot combination, it is only referred to once <br />in the City code and that is for the seasonal recreational zoning district (basically Big Island). Staff felt it <br />was appropriate that the Council have some input in what is an appropriate special lot combination. <br />Special lot combination is an agreement between the City and the property owner where they agree to <br />consider a couple of lots as one lot for building purposes and the property owner agrees to give up certain <br />rights for the building that does not have the principal structure. Barnhart noted they see if frequently <br />with driveways going through one property into another to serve it or one lot houses the dock or a garage <br />and the principal structure is on another lot. He is looking for authorization to look into it a bit more and <br />bring back some proposals for the Council’s consideration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.