My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2021
>
01-11-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2021 9:58:12 AM
Creation date
4/15/2021 9:55:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 7, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 15 <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING – Continued <br /> <br />Seals moved, Johnson seconded, to waive the Planning Commission review. Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh opened the public hearing at 6:36 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh closed the public hearing at 6:36 p.m. <br /> <br />Seals moved, Johnson seconded, to approve the Resolution LA20-000072. Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />22. LA20-000048 – Timothy Whitten o/b/o Irwin Jacobs 2018 Rev Trust, 1700 Shoreline Drive <br />Preliminary Plat – Resolution <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh clarified the expectation of the Council on this: they are not making a decision or having <br />conversation around this, but rather the Applicant will give a quick update. He noted this is not a public <br />hearing as it still needs to go back through the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Patrick Steinhoff of Malkerson, Gunn, and Martin, 220 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, is the Attorney for <br />the Applicant, which is the Irwin Jacobs Trust. Mr. Steinhoff gave an update on the application based on <br />issues from the last meeting on October 26, 2020. One issue was a suggestion that they were moving too <br />fast, making changes on the fly in response to public comments without allowing sufficient time for the <br />public to consider them. At the suggestion of City Staff, City Attorney, and City Planner, the Applicant <br />has agreed to return the application to the Planning Commission for a full public hearing. Right now, <br />they are updating all of the application materials, and once Staff has given feedback, there will be <br />neighbor meetings, they will invite Councilmembers to view the site, basically starting the application <br />from scratch. As to the nature of the changes to the Application; the Council may recall there was lots of <br />discussion regarding average lakeshore setback (ALS) in past meetings. The Applicant is revising the <br />plan to move all of the lots so they have house pads behind the existing ALS, and that required them to <br />eliminate a lot and that will hopefully eliminate the ALS as an issue. Another change to the plans regards <br />some objection to the road so they are redesigning the road to make the cul-de-sac shorter and if Staff <br />identifies any other issues, the Applicant will address those as they come up and make adjustments to the <br />plan. The plan is to give the Council an application that conforms to the ordinances and then they can <br />make adjustments based on feedback. Mr. Steinhoff welcomed questions and noted Tim Whitten is also <br />in attendance if there are questions. He looks forward to the public hearing on the application. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh noted they are not looking for questions at this point, but they do look forward to seeing the <br />Applicant at the public hearing before the Planning Commission. Once it gets through that process, it will <br />get back in front of the Council. He appreciates the update and where the Applicant is going with it. <br /> <br />24. LA20-000071 – Jacob Stickney, 15 Stubbs Bay Road/PID 3211823340006, Variances – <br />Resolution <br /> <br />Ms. Oakden noted the Applicant is requesting the lot area, lot width, and side yard setback variances. The <br />Applicant is planning to construct a new home on the property which currently sits vacant; the proposed <br />home has a similar front yard setback as the neighboring property to the north. During the Planning <br />Commission, neighbors did attend and voiced some concern regarding the original proposed house 24. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.