My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-25-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2021
>
01-25-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2021 9:54:48 AM
Creation date
4/15/2021 9:52:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 4, 2021 <br />2:30 p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 4 of 10 <br /> <br />2. ACCEPT RESIGNATION OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR DUSTIN RIEF - Continued <br /> <br />Attorney Mattick said someone could make a motion now or wait until they sort through the <br />$3,500 issue and have it be one big bulk motion. <br /> <br />Johnson stated this is a simple contractual agreement and he would recommend that the Council <br />adhere to the provisions of the contract. That is the reason why they had a contract and in his <br />research there was some concern about the amount of moving expenses and this was a good <br />incentive…if Rief stayed in Orono, they would pay him more. He noted that it did not work out <br />that way, so to Johnson it is a simple following of the terms of the contract agreed to. <br /> <br />Seals said that is where she is at, as well. In the beginning, moving expenses were lower and the <br />City increased the number with the “carrot” on the end. She stated it is a written contract and <br />that is the reason the City put it in there. Every company she has been with that has something in <br />place like this – if someone leaves early, they leave early and that is what they signed up for. <br />She agrees with following the contract as by not following the contract, they question the validity <br />of contracts going forward. <br /> <br />Walsh takes the opposite approach and said it has nothing to do with the validity of the contract, <br />as anyone can ask to change their portion of the contract. He thinks it is a good faith item <br />because of the family issues that are bringing Rief home to Nebraska and it would well-serve the <br />community because these are public meetings. He said “we are humans as well,” and it didn’t <br />work out completely, Rief did a good job overall while he was here and Walsh said it would be a <br />small token of sending Rief off for the job that he did. He thinks it would go a long way in their <br />community effort as they look for a new City Administrator and that they have compassion as <br />people on the Orono City Council. <br /> <br />Printup agrees on the compassion, but thinks they should stick with the contract and the <br />amendments. <br /> <br />Crosby sides with Walsh on this one, he thinks it is a small token to show concern for a member <br />of the Orono family and does not think it is a big price to pay. <br /> <br />Walsh said that is the only item truly remaining, they just need to vote on the $3,500 amount that <br />Rief has asked forgiveness on. <br /> <br />Attorney Mattick thinks the rest of the guidance works but the vote on $3,500 would be good. <br /> <br />Johnson moved, Seals seconded, to keep the terms of the contract for the repayment of a <br />portion of moving expenses. Vote: Ayes (Johnson, Printup, Seals), Nays 2 (Crosby, Walsh). <br /> <br />Mattick noted the Council could make a motion to appoint Olson officially as interim. He asked <br />the Council how to go forward with the two union contracts as Rief was in the room with <br />Attorney Mattick and he believes a staff member should be present.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.