My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2021
>
02-22-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2021 9:39:41 AM
Creation date
4/15/2021 9:37:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 8, 2021 <br />6:03 p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 5 of 26 <br /> <br />19. LA20-000048 - TIMOTHY WHITTEN O/B/O I. JACOBS/A. JACOBS REVOCABLE <br />TRUST, 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE, PRELIMINARY PLAT - RESOLUTION – Continued <br /> <br />Barnhart asked if he is referring to Lot 5. <br /> <br />Johnson replied for the entire property. For example, it is a completely blank lot and someone wants to <br />put a single family home on this property. Where would the City’s setback be from the Tanager side. <br /> <br />Barnhart clarified this is a vacant lot at 1700 Shoreline, the 20 acre parcel noted on-screen in blue. As a <br />setback from Tanager, three things will come into play: the 75 foot lake lot setback, some bluffs and other <br />things within the lot that will provide additional setback. Barnhart said this is his estimation of what the <br />ALS is: the neighboring lake lot to the west is Lot 3 of Tanager estates and that is not improved so that is <br />a vacant lot. Therefore the average lakeshore setback for this lot is based on the distance between the <br />improved lot to the east which is 1100 Millston and that is the 398 foot setback. He said that is roughly <br />what the red line on-screen is. Barnhart stated it is not perfect and he looks for engineers and surveyors to <br />give a better number, but based on his measurement tool that is what he was able to estimate. <br /> <br />Johnson said under the City’s code they would not be drawing a line between the property to the east and <br />the property that does exist to the west. They would be using a distance from Tanager, from the ordinary <br />high water mark based on the property to the east only. <br /> <br />Barnhart replied yes. <br /> <br />Walsh stated it is because there is no other house on the other lot yet. Once there is a home, they will <br />have the measurement between the two if it is there before anything gets built. <br /> <br />Johnson noted the one that exists to the east is not relevant. <br /> <br />Crosby said the one to the east is relevant. <br /> <br />Johnson apologized and clarified to the west. They have the one to the east but there is a property to the <br />west existing. <br /> <br />Barnhart replied yes, but it is a lot over. The City only looks at the neighboring lots; the lot to the west is <br />currently vacant, which is Lot 3 of Tanager Estates. When the house is built, they will then draw that line <br />between the two. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if they come around the corner on the west side of the property, is that a different lot right <br />there. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated that is a different lot, yes. <br /> <br />Johnson said that is a different lot but they are not considering that lot. <br /> <br />Barnhart said that is a lake lot only on Smith Bay and it is not a lake lot on Tanager Lake. That is where <br />the line comes in. To his estimation it is the closest point to this house to Smith Bay and the closest point <br />of the neighboring lot to the east and that is where the line comes in. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.