Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 8, 2021 <br />6:03 p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 22 of 26 <br /> <br />19. LA20-000048 - TIMOTHY WHITTEN O/B/O I. JACOBS/A. JACOBS REVOCABLE <br />TRUST, 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE, PRELIMINARY PLAT - RESOLUTION – Continued <br /> <br />Walsh said what he is reading in this is the County is saying “we don’t want to do this, but if you come up <br />with something that shows it has to be and you have some analysis that shows us, we’re putting that <br />burden on you.” That is basically what they are saying which is the same thing Mattick said. <br />Johnson read from the screen “the City engineering is welcome to come to a different conclusion,” so are <br />they the local authority having jurisdiction. <br /> <br />Mattick said they are. If the City wants to pay for a full engineering study that somehow says the County <br />took a pass on this one, we’re going to dig in and prove that those turn lanes are absolutely necessary <br />based on sound engineering criteria, then they are free to do so. He said they do not have that right now; <br />what they have are inclinations that it is busy down there. <br /> <br />Walsh stated the County could say in the end, “now we agree with your point but for $4,000,000 we’re <br />not going to do this; however, if the City wants to come up with $4,000,000 you can do it.” It looks like <br />the County has given their general answer. <br /> <br />Johnson does not know the context of this email, and he does not know how many lots they were talking <br />about at the time. <br /> <br />Barnhart said it was 7 lots at the time of the email. <br /> <br />Johnson is in favor of putting a motion together that tables the application until the City Council has <br />clarity about what turn lanes are feasible by the County. <br /> <br />Walsh said it sounds like they already know – they just answered it right there. <br /> <br />Johnson stated the County just said they are not going to pay for it, so is this a condition of the <br />development. <br /> <br />Barnhart replied no, the attached letter is a condition of the development. Staff put in as a recommended <br />condition that Hennepin County approval of the road access/intersection - and they could certainly add <br />the word turn lane(s) in there – is what they put in as a condition of approval for the preliminary plat. <br />Touching back on the timeline, it is situated such that Barnhart is asking for direction tonight and he will <br />come back with a resolution of either approval or denial at the next City Council meeting. He does not <br />have the authority to extend the timeline himself. <br /> <br />Crosby said unless he is missing something he does not see how the City Council can deny this. <br /> <br />Walsh stated they are not looking for any more input right now. <br /> <br />Crosby noted if everything is done as required, everything is fitting in, they cannot hold their hand in the <br />air and say they do not like five houses, they want three or two. He would say put one house but they <br />cannot do that. <br /> <br />Walsh said that is true. <br />