Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 8, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 6 of 23 <br /> <br />like that, speak up so the City can at least look at it and understand if there are any changes on the fly that <br />need to be made as they want to be sure they do it right the first time. <br /> <br />Seals moved, Printup seconded, to approve the 2021 Road Maintenance Project Award. VOTE: <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />23. PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY APPROVAL OF UTILITY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN <br /> <br />Edwards said this is something they may normally see on Consent Agenda. This item is to conduct the <br />design and engineering for connecting water and sewer lines from the existing sewer and water system <br />down underneath Highway 12, the railroad track, and then back up into the new parcel the City procured <br />early this year for a future potential public works facility. Normally they would go with their already <br />established engineering firm Bolton and Menk, and in this case they solicited proposals from two firms: <br />Bolton and Menk and WSB. The two proposals came in pretty close, WSB at $28,736 and Bolton and <br />Menk at $29,000. He is requesting authorization to move forward. His initial staff recommendation <br />would be to go with WSB as they have the lower number; however, the Council may want to consider <br />keeping it with the existing engineering firm due to the low difference and ease of someone they already <br />have on projects. <br /> <br />Walsh noted that essentially the bids are the same. He would suggest going with Bolton and Menk as <br />they are the City Engineering firm and they have a good working relationship. If WSB came in at $8,000 <br />less or something dramatic, but for a couple hundred bucks, if they can match that sounds reasonable. <br /> <br />Crosby stated if they will match it, yes. <br /> <br />Crosby moved, Seals seconded, to accept the bid from Bolton and Menk for the Public Works <br />Facility Approval of Utility Engineering and Design. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />Dave Martini from Bolton and Menk thanked the Council and said they really appreciate the partnership <br />they have had for a lot of years. They enjoy working on fun projects like this and he thinks they have put <br />together a good team to manage this as well as the City’s Staff. <br /> <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> <br />25. LA21-000010 CHAMBERLAIN FINE CUSTOM HOMES, 133 CHEVY CHASE VARIANCE <br /> <br />Staff presented a summary packet of information. Tonight, the Council will consider a variance <br />application for a rear-yard setback encroachment and will provide Staff with direction for a resolution. <br />The Applicants are looking to add a screened in porch to the rear of their home, which sits on a curved <br />road with neighbors on either side and Wayzata Country Club to the north of the property on the rear <br />property line. Staff, through their practical difficulty analysis, found that the practical difficulties were <br />not met. The proposed addition would have minimal impact to the neighbors and would not alter the <br />character of the neighborhood. However, the property owner has adequate use of the lot currently for a <br />single-family home and there are other locations for a conforming addition. The proposed addition acts <br />as a convenience to the property and not a necessity to the use of the lot. The Planning Commission held <br />a public hearing on February 16, 2021 with no verbal comments. The Commission reviewed Staff’s <br />analysis and the Applicant’s narrative; after discussion with the property owners and reviewing the 12 <br />letters of support from the neighborhood, the Commissioners found that due to the existing location of the