My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-29-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020-2024
>
2021
>
03-29-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2021 9:22:22 AM
Creation date
4/15/2021 9:20:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 8, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />Walsh agreed the Planning Commission did a good job. <br /> <br />FINANCE DIRECTOR REPORT <br /> <br />a. FOURTH QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT <br /> <br />Maggie Ung presented the Fourth Quarter 2020 budget report. These numbers should be considered <br />preliminary numbers and may change with the preparation for the 2020 audit. Looking at the overall <br />revenue, the City collected 101.1% of the budgeted revenue compared to 107.8% in 2019. Tax revenue, <br />which makes up 50% of the revenue budget, is at 99.1%. The next line item is License and Permits; the <br />last few years this line item has exceeded budget and this year due to less development, COVID-19 <br />pandemic, and the State-mandated shutdowns, it is only at 93.78% compared to 141.5% in 2019. The <br />other two sources under budget are Charges for Service (98%) and Fines (54.3%). Charges for Service <br />fell under budget as a result of decrease in police special service due to the COVID-19 social distancing <br />and gathering guidelines, along with a decrease in Plan Check and Site Exam fee revenue. Fines is under <br />budget due to not collecting as many court fines as anticipated; this correlates to a decrease in speeding <br />and impaired driving due to COVID-19. The two line items that have done well in 2020 are Other <br />Governmental and Golf Course revenue. Other Governmental revenue ended the year at 131.4%; the <br />main variance is the CARES Act Funding offset with a reduction in the Toward Zero Deaths grant that <br />the City is not administering in 2020. The Golf Course revenue is at 203.06% compared to 102.7% in <br />2019. COVID-19 played a large role in this revenue item as many indoor social gatherings were advised <br />against and therefore there was an uptick in individuals taking to outdoor activities such as golfing. <br />Building Permit revenue in 2020, the City only made 84.5% of the budget compared to 135% in 2019. <br />On the Planned Check and Site Exam, it only made 84.6% of budget in 2020 compared to 172.8% in <br />2019. Ms. Ung gave an overview of 2020 revenue and moved on to expenditures. The biggest item over <br />budget was the Special Projects Department, which is at 1,145% and was due to the City buying land for <br />future projects that was not budgeted. Central Service and Public Works is also slightly over budget due <br />to trying to keep the common area clean and maintaining social distancing due to COVID-19. The <br />increase in expenditure in these line items is offset by the CARES Act grant. The golf course is also over <br />budget due to course maintenance and more bank fees that offset with the revenue intake. COVID-19 has <br />played a significant impact overall on the 2020 budget; fourth quarter is looking good with revenue <br />exceeding budget and expenditures falling slightly under budget. This projects a positive variance of <br />$224,000 for the General Fund. The top 5 vendors for Quarter 4 make up 36.8% of the vendors paid in <br />Quarter 4 of 2020. The top 5 vendors for the year of 2020 make up 31% of the vendors paid for the <br />whole year. She concluded her presentation and asked if there are any questions. <br /> <br />Walsh wants to point out a couple of things. Overall, the City’s revenues were above what they were <br />hoping by $170,000 and expenses were less than what they thought by $54,000 which gave a positive net <br />of $224,000 over and above revenues which would be good for going towards next year for roads – which <br />he knows is near and dear to Edwards’ heart. Also, regarding the top vendors, there was a $240,000 <br />balance but that included paying for the land of $340,000 so really it is at $580,000. He noted they paid <br />for the land out of the revenues of this year, as well. That was a huge positive and leads the City very <br />well going into budget this summer. Even though their permanent revenue was down just a bit, they have <br />kept stepping that up over the years as they have had such a divergent variance of what was happening <br />versus what was getting done. To have it that close in a COVID year is a testament to the strength of the <br />housing market and building, as long as the interest rates stay reasonable. Walsh said they budgeted well <br />and should have some extra room this year to hopefully increase the roads a bit, bring their parks where
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.