My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-29-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
03-29-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2021 9:22:22 AM
Creation date
4/15/2021 9:20:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 8, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 13 of 23 <br /> <br />Walsh said if one is at the Orono Orchard stoplight, they see everyone’s garage all the way down the <br />road. <br /> <br />Crosby is thinking more safety of the neighborhood and he thinks it is well done. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted all the roads will be privately maintained, the utilities will be constructed by the developer <br />but the City will be maintaining those, and the fees are outlined for the trunk and other connection fees. <br />Staff put together a resolution for approval and are looking for feedback on some of those issues in terms <br />of the density and the design of the project. <br /> <br />Johnson thinks it is a good idea to connect that trail. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if that was in the comments. <br /> <br />Barnhart replied he did suggest connecting to the trail along Wayzata Boulevard. The County also <br />provided some comment and asked for some additional right-of-way at the corner for an American <br />Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible ramps; the Applicant suggested that would be feasible. The fire <br />department suggested some changes as to where the hydrant would be located and that is incorporated in <br />the memo. The Applicant has not raised any issues in which they are not willing to work with the City <br />on. Staff recommends approval of the 4 actions before the Council. Barnhart noted right before the <br />Planning Commission meeting there was a private meeting and Staff received a number of comments <br />after that which he has shared with the Council. Primarily the main issue that has not been addressed is <br />the location of this drive. The neighborhood across the street has some concerns that this driveway will <br />impact properties across the street from a headlight standpoint. <br /> <br />Johnson looked at that and did not see it. <br /> <br />Barnhart said the concern is that headlights from cars exiting the site will shine on the front spaces of the <br />buildings. <br /> <br />Crosby said aren’t the other buildings more elevated across the street. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted there is some elevation change and the engineer has done some searching on the issue and <br />can comment on that. <br /> <br />Mr. Saddiqui clarified the proposed site is about 3.5 feet below and they went back to the traffic engineer <br />internally and looked at it. Where the drive is coming out is the highest point on Kelley Parkway which is <br />an ideal location and it happens that it is right across from the other cul-de-sac and is not really shooting <br />directly in. <br /> <br />Walsh said having the streets straight across from each other is about as good as they can get. <br /> <br />Seals asked to zoom in and said it is quite a ways. She suggested arborvitaes on the other side. <br /> <br />Johnson said they are lined up and it makes sense to him. He noted they could get some headlights over <br />there but this is a high-density area. <br /> <br />Walsh said likewise the people there will be up higher and shining lights into this property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.