Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 8, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 11 of 23 <br /> <br />other features help address a design issue. From a Planning Staff perspective, they identified a potential <br />concern as to how those buildings are oriented. In solution, Staff suggested perhaps flipping the buildings <br />so the front would face out, then they would have the “public face” of those buildings. To do that they <br />would route the road interior to basically circle Outlot C there. The Planning Commission was not <br />supportive of that suggestion; they did not think it was necessary and to flip those buildings they would <br />have to reduce the setbacks a bit further and the Planning Commission was not willing to go that far. <br />Barnhart throws that out there and looks for feedback on whether the Council would like that. The <br />Applicant did react to the Council’s comments from the original sketch plan process. <br /> <br />Crosby asked if there is any room for berming. <br /> <br />Barnhart replied no there is not, it is a 10-foot setback. Even with 20 feet it would not be enough for <br />berming. From an RPUD standpoint the project shows the 10% private recreation area and since this <br />project will be a subdivision there will be a park dedication fee required. <br /> <br />Seals said if they mimic what Stone Bay has, they do not have any garages facing exterior. <br /> <br />Walsh noted they would have the fronts on Kelley. But the problem is this project has three roads on <br />three sides. <br /> <br />Crosby noted there are no garages sides showing on Stone Bay. <br /> <br />Barnhart said off of Willow the setback is quite a bit greater as there is a wetland and vegetation there. <br />The buildings on Kelley have their front there but there is also an elevation change; they do meet the 30- <br />foot setback. <br /> <br />Walsh said part of what they must remember is the back will be facing Highway 12, so it is not like <br />people are walking their dog down the street. Originally what was nice about this is that they obviously <br />zoned this way too dense and the Applicants came in, took the advice the Council gave the previous <br />developer, brought it down to 37 units, and he appreciates their flexibility. Now it is just the fine-tuning. <br />Along the Highway if they have the backs and some arborvitaes to brunt that a bit; the same with Willow, <br />the only thing across from there is Harvest Moon and Otten Brothers with trucks coming in and out all the <br />time. <br /> <br />Crosby said they could add some type of fencing. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted the Applicant proposes an ornamental style fence along Willow, Wayzata, and the west <br />side, but that won’t be intended to screen. <br /> <br />Crosby stated they will see the recreation area in the middle where it is safer for families and kids. <br /> <br />Johnson said the Applicant made a lot of changes since the Planning Commission and that is not one of <br />the changes they made and there is probably a reason. <br /> <br />Walsh noted the Applicant is here and invited them up to talk. <br /> <br />Aziz Saddiqui with David Weekley Homes, 12000 White Water Drive, Minnetonka, thanked the Council <br />for all the feedback from the previous year. There were three big points they took away from Council and